|
If cost were such a large factor, then how could London's bid accomodate baseball and softball in the first place? Whether cost is used as an excuse (valid or not), the games could have accomodated both sports. Also, many other sports have costly arena's, as well as temporary arenas (ie beach volleyball) yet they survive. I fail to see why baseball should have been singled out for any logical reason. Applying the logic of cost and temporary stadiums would eliminate other sports also.
|