1230
"He has [%batting bb word] and struck out [%batting k word]"
Another one like that. I've usually not seen any reference to what the [] mean unless the word "word" isn't in the [] call. So would this say struck out 20 Ks?
1257
"He has also chipped in with [%batting rbi word], [%batting r word] runs scored"
Same as 1230. Would that say 20 Rs runs scored?
1259
"He has [%batting h word], stolen [%batting sb word] and scored "
Sort of the same. Would that say stolen 20 SBs?
1268
"this year with [%batting hr word] and [%batting rbi word] RBIs."
Sort of the same again. Would that say and 20 RBI RBIs?
1285
" he is batting [%batting avg]. He has bagged [%batting h word], [%batting d word] of which went for doubles"
Same. Would that say 20 2B of which went for doubles?
Obviously not certain (don't remember or haven't seen) how [... word] ends up appearing.
1233
"He has has scored [%batting r] times"
Too many "has"s
1290
"[%personlink L] has also has swiped "
"has also has"
1321
"stepped to the plate on [%batting ab] occasions "
Talks like it should be PAs but calls ABs.
No telling how long I could go on reading this. I get quite bored. Feel free to tell me to shut up if it's not helping.
Also if I'm reading those calls wrong let me know, like the [... word] call.