Quote:
Originally Posted by BaseballMan
But its ok to rush to judgement on Clemens?
Oh wait because McNamee said so its true.
I guess its common practice for trainers to save syringes.
You know just in case they may need it to prove their case.
If this had happen in the 2004-2007 seasons i might beleive him.
But this happened when baseball was basically ignoring the whole steroid problem. So does it really make sense that he would save syringes from one player when there wasnt much sign that baseball was gonna do anything about the problem. And if these syringes are truly from Clemens and did contain steroids, then why didnt he offer it to the Mitchell investigation?
They did collect copies of checks so are we to beleive they wouldnt have collected this so called evidence?
|
Because so far no evidence is supporting the Clemens side.
McNamee already has Pettitte and Knoblauch proving at least some of things he said are true. What does Clemens have?
I think your reasoning about the syringe thing is just a stretch. There are tons of scenarios for this kind of thing. It's not like McNamee doesn't know he'd be asked about motivations about keeping these syringe, and we can simply wait for him to answer the questions in the Congress.
Same for the whole Jim Murray deal. Wouldn't you want to hear what Jim Murray has to say?