Quote:
Originally Posted by Skipaway
Because so far no evidence is supporting the Clemens side.
McNamee already has Pettitte and Knoblauch proving at least some of things he said are true. What does Clemens have?
I think your reasoning about the syringe thing is just a stretch. There are tons of scenarios for this kind of thing. It's not like McNamee doesn't know he'd be asked about motivations about keeping these syringe, and we can simply wait for him to answer the questions in the Congress.
Same for the whole Jim Murray deal. Wouldn't you want to hear what Jim Murray has to say?
|
Pettitte admitted to using it two times. Thats hardly the same as admitting to using it for 3 years. Because one person wanted to try it to help with an injury means Clemens is lying?
Clemens offered taped conversation but that of course was as setup.
He offers a report on his career.
His stats are not unbeleivable for a player without steroids.
His body hasnt changed.
What evidence do you think he could offer?
My reasoning is a stretch? It makes sense to you that he would save this stuff for 7 years? Come on thats a bit of stretch. I could see the last few years but not going back 7 years ago. Did he keep syringes on Pettitte & Knoblauch too?
Sure i want to hear what Jim Murray says but McNamee needs to prove Clemens is guilty. Clemens should not have to prove he is innocent.