Quote:
Originally Posted by Skipaway
Why are you only thinking from Clemens' side? This is not like the Bonds situation, where it's general interest against Bonds.
Here we are in a situation with one person against another person. You are offering tons of reasons to doubt McNamee, without bothering to considering the alternative explanations that would favor McNamee, or casting any doubt toward Clemens. There are tons of ways to reasonably explain McNamee's actions so far, but I don't see the need to speculate, since the hearing is coming up.
McNamee is simply a worthless human being to you, while Clemens is someone you have to defend over McNamee?
|
And you are not doing the same with McNamee. I never said McNamee was a worthless human being. I simply dont beleive his truth is reliable. You make a case for McNamee but you havent told me explanations that Clemens could be innoncent or not guilty either. So why should i not take Clemens side if thats who i beleive is telling the truth? Are you not basically taking McNamee's side. That is speaking from what you have told me and not elsewhere on this board.