Quote:
Originally Posted by Splitter24
Let me reiterate that I have no opinion on whether Clemens used PED's, nor do I care.
But you were the one who said that his stats "were not unbelievable for a player without steroids." And I simply am still asking you what would be? What level would a starting pitcher's stats have to be to get you suspicious?
In my opinion, his stats don't really mean anything when it comes to answering whether he used PED's or not.
|
And his stats are not unbelievable compared to the top players of those year.
Its not like he was the first 30 game winner since McLain and threw almost 300 strikeouts with a below 2.00 era. The stats just dont look out of the ordinary. If the stats dont mean anything then why does it even matter if a player took steroids? If the stats dont tell you anything as to whether a player took them or not then what difference do steroids really make?
If they really helped wouldnt you notice a big difference.
Then again ive never been a beleiver that steroids has much effect has the public is led to beleive.
Ten years from now if the same records are being set or broken as the ones
now will we still be using steroids as an explanation or credting the players ability, coaching, training etc. When do we get back to giving the players credit for their accomplishments? Thats all i want to see. If that means clearing Clemens or convicting him i dont care just get to the truth.