Quote:
Originally Posted by The Playmaker
I heard Dowd on a radio interview about 8 months ago. It was his opinion that had they kept looking they would have found evidence that Rose bet while he was playing and also was seemed near certain they would have found evidence he bet against the Reds. With what they had at the time and Rose agreeing to the lifetime ban, there was simply no more reason to keep digging nor enough time to prove it.
|
Quite possibly true. But you can't judge on what Dowd THINKS he would have found, only on the evidence. And they didn't have evidence he bet as a player.