View Single Post
Old 05-11-2008, 01:03 AM   #12 (permalink)
DrSatan
Minors (Triple A)
 
DrSatan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 231
Quote:
Originally Posted by BruceM View Post
You've had every single player reach his potential. I guess if that's what you want in a league, then good for you. I've never had that happen, there are always busts, a lot more than there are success stories, much like real life.

Setting talent change randomness to 1 means it won't go down, it also means you won't get boosts either. So yes, there is risk both ways.
ed zachary, there won't be any boosts, but there's not that many boosts anyway. Sooooo like I said, there is no risk in lowering the number for talent change randomness. I would much rather have my prospects perform as advertised vs have them bust. When it comes to pitchers this is a major problem. There are too many instances when a pitching prospect reaches the majors, does a great job for one or two years, and then craps out.
DrSatan is offline   Reply With Quote