View Single Post
Old 05-11-2008, 06:22 AM   #1 (permalink)
KurtBevacqua
Hall Of Famer
 
KurtBevacqua's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 2,615
Does this controversial player get your HoF vote #4: Barry Bonds

OK, it's time for the mac daddy of controversial ballplayers himself. Should I even bother listing the credentials? Oh well, I'll list some of them.

7-time NL MVP
14-time all star
all-time home run leader
8 gold gloves
2 batting titles
6th all-time slugging
4th all-time OPS
3rd all-time in runs scored
4th all-time in total bases
4th all-time in RBIs
1st all-time in walks
1st all-time in runs created
single season home run record
Pretty much destroys all the HoF numerical measures

Why he belongs in the Hall
- His onfield measurables probably place him in the top three batters of all-time along with Ruth and Williams. There is absolutely no question of his Hall worthiness as a player

- The old "He was a Hall of Fame Player before he took steroids" argument

- Also the old "steroids weren't banned by baseball when he took them" argument

- The old "But Barry didn't know he was taking steroids" argument

Why Barry shouldn't be in the Hall
- There is a mountain of circumstantial evidence suggesting that Barry Bonds indeed did use performance enhancing drugs

- Bonds admitted in testimony that he indeed did take performance enhancing drugs, although he also maintains he did so unkowingly

- He was indicted for perjury in relation to his testimony on whether or not he took illegal performance enhancing drugs

Shall I outline the details of the allegations and circumstantial evidence against Bonds? Maybe in another post.
Attached Images
 
__________________
"The amount of violations of human rights in a country is always an inverse function of the amount of complaints about human rights violations heard from there. The greater the number of complaints being aired, the better protected are human rights in that country."

- Moynihan's Law
KurtBevacqua is offline   Reply With Quote