Quote:
Originally Posted by kq76
Would you really want them to be worse than what your own eyes tell you though? I agree, you want to use your own scouts and rely on them more as they could really zero in on guys, but is there really a point to having centralized scouting at all if it's this bad? I don't think so. What benefit is there from it? It's just going to be completely ignored by people who have at least some experience with the game and for those with no experience with the game they might just think the entire game is garbage after seeing it jump all over the place. I can easily foresee people trashing it without realizing that that part of the game is really not supposed to be worth relying on.
I don't know what to recommend, but I agree with the poster who said that the more well known a player is the more on target his central scouting should probably be. And even if the ratings are way off for youngsters maybe Markus should try to limit those way off ratings to only one or two ratings at a time for most. Another idea might be to make central scouting on a more general scale like 1-10 and team scouting on a more detailed scale like 1-100, but if the person selects the 1-10 scale that wouldn't make a difference. Anyway, there's lots of ways to improve it, but I think it should probably come close to telling you what you would tell yourself if you looked at the player's stats.
|
Yeah, I see this, you're right. Especially if it totally turns people off to the game. I think if my two cents counted, and they don't, I would agree with the poster above who suggested just trashing the OSA ratings altogether. Plus I see the point about having those hideous ratings being part of the player history page forever. Be nice to me if they scrapped the OSA ratings altogether, and on the player history page it didn't include any scouting reports, or included links to specific scouts scouting reports maybe?? I dunno. LIke I said before, totally unqualified to speak, but that usually doesn't stop me.
