Quote:
Originally Posted by KySteveH
Okay, this may or may not be a good idea, but I'm going to say it anyway. One of the things that happens in any of these community projects is that a version gets cobbled together by a bunch of people, then gets released, and there are error, inaccuracies, disagreements, etc. I think that a big reason for this is that there is no QA process, which seems pretty damn important for a project of this nature.
So if a chunk or work gets done on contracts, I think it would be great for a 2nd person to take a look and check the work. It's incredibly easy to make mistakes on this kind of data entry, and really hard to spot your're own mistakes.
Thoughts? And yeah, I guess I'm volunteering too.
|
I would agree- but getting biased ratings is a LOT better than the state of affairs the minor leaguers are in now.....I agree with Cubby- the MLB players only need minor tweaking- and most of that may not even be subjective (contracts and Uniform #'s for example). I agree it should be checked- and I also think that there should be some sort of idea on how to rate players- but we can try and normalize them from there.