OOTP Developments Forums - View Single Post

swampdragon · 06-28-2008, 11:00 AM

I endorse interleague play for that time period. No question that it's better not to have just three other teams on the schedule. I'd prefer that each team play every other team the same number of times.

I also endorse interleague play for 1892-1900, but I don't think it's quite as important. I just hate to see the Orioles plus Cy Young (Cleveland) over in the American League not matching up with Boston, New York, or Philadelphia. I'd honestly prefer a six team per subleague format with full interleague play for that period.

06-28-2008, 11:00 AM	#9 (permalink)
swampdragon All Star Starter Join Date: May 2002 Location: The Lonely Mountain Posts: 1,732	I endorse interleague play for that time period. No question that it's better not to have just three other teams on the schedule. I'd prefer that each team play every other team the same number of times. I also endorse interleague play for 1892-1900, but I don't think it's quite as important. I just hate to see the Orioles plus Cy Young (Cleveland) over in the American League not matching up with Boston, New York, or Philadelphia. I'd honestly prefer a six team per subleague format with full interleague play for that period. __________________ "The only way to oblige men to speak well of us is to act well." -- Voltaire Last edited by swampdragon : 06-28-2008 at 11:05 AM.