Quote:
Originally Posted by swampdragon
I also endorse interleague play for 1892-1900, but I don't think it's quite as important. I just hate to see the Orioles plus Cy Young (Cleveland) over in the American League not matching up with Boston, New York, or Philadelphia. I'd honestly prefer a six team per subleague format with full interleague play for that period.
|
Interesting idea, I hadn't thought of that.
The thing is, one it reaches 16 teams it can't be cut back to 12 teams.
Your point about player interactions is noted for the 1892-1899 period is noted. I already have the basics for a standard balanced 126-game schedule for each 8-team subleague for that period; perhaps I can create a version that includes reasonably balanced interleague play as an alternative selection.
__________________
.
"We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things not because they are easy, but because they are hard. Because that goal will serve to organize and measure the best of our abilities and skills, because that challenge is one we are willing to accept, one we are unwilling to postpone, and one which we intend to win."
.
|