View Single Post
Old 08-12-2008, 11:50 PM   #106 (permalink)
darkcloud4579
Hall Of Famer
 
darkcloud4579's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,248
Blog Entries: 29
Thanked 66x in 37 posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by RonCo View Post
Duplicating my post elsewhere:

I think I've finally settled on

Batting Aging: 1.75
Batting Development: .6
Pitching Aging: 1.75
Pitching Development: .7

(Along with Sky Dog's other modifiers)

I've actually had better success with Pitcher Aging at 2.5 (though I admit I don't know if it makes much difference past 2.0), but then you need to start getting into changing League Totals and even stronger AI reliance on ratings in order to stop long-career pitchers finishing with a string of k/9 rates of 2.0-3.0.

This is probably the last time I'm going do this kind of a study. It's just too hard to figure out how to make the thing work right with this development engine, and I quite honestly have lost my passion for it at this point.
Appreciate the study, nonetheless. It was a yeoman's effort and one that immersinik's everywhere truly appreciate.

Even if we deviate from them a bit.
__________________
SLOP: Commissioner
FOBL: Marlboro Townies
FOFC-FBCB: Kansas Jayhawks
ZOMGFL: Colorado Buffaloes
Omnivore FBS Computer Ranking
darkcloud4579 is offline   Reply With Quote