View Single Post
Old 10-06-2008, 04:33 PM   #3 (permalink)
PhillieFever
Hall Of Famer
 
PhillieFever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: South Philly
Posts: 5,884
Thanks: 367
Thanked 303x in 259 posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by CharlesC View Post
I have run leagues with free agency and arbitration in the past, and found the salaries to be a bit high but fairly reasonable. Now I am running a historical league that began in 1960, so I do not have free agency and therefore cannot have arbitration. The trouble is, the salaries for second through sixth-year players are absolutely astronomical, MUCH higher than even if they were arbitrated, MUCH higher than the revenues can support. Is there any way to actual negotiate a salary in the pre-free agency era? Or is there any way to lower the salaries to a level more suitable for the revenue streams of that era? As a note, my revenues are set to the 1960 level, but every team is in the red due to the salaries. This seems to be because well over half the players are rated as "above average" by the AI and several mediocre players are given star-level salaries. One would think that in the pre-free agency era, when the owners had far more negotiating power than they do presently, they would use that power to keep slaries lower, rather then making them higher than they are with free agency.

Thank you for any suggestions.
I think the problems stem from the attendance levels,they're way too low.At least thats what I've experienced.The average attendance for a game in 1960 was 16,110 what do you have it set an in the game?
PhillieFever is offline   Reply With Quote