Quote:
Originally Posted by djday45
Mmm, Not sure Thunder, mine is def coming up with a 10. I must have missed something?
|
Maybe . . no biggie. I think that any more improvement might be bordering on overkill, but thanks for checking.
I looked at the old Folley and I think you're clearly right, he wasn't good enough. (I ran him 100 fights each against his real life opponents that have ratings and his winning pct. was too low). I employed your changes and his numbers came out above his career winning pct. against those opponents.
So I found a happy medium I was comfortable with that produced numbers that worked for me.
Great thing about TB, to each their own. I might not always agree with your numbers, but at least people are still thinking critically about that which we have to work!