View Single Post
Old 12-22-2008, 04:18 AM   #3 (permalink)
Le Grande Orange
Hall Of Famer
 
Le Grande Orange's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Scheduleslovakia
Posts: 10,231
Thanks: 4
Thanked 1,177x in 700 posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by gmo View Post
The balance will not be perfect, especially for the 16-team subleague. That works out to 10.8 games per opponent, while the ~12.5 for the 14-team subleague figures to be a little simpler to work out. Ideally the variation will be no more than one game (either 10 or 11 games per opponent in the 16-team subleague and either 12 or 13 games per opponent in the 14-team subleague)...
Well, for the 14-team AL any of the actual AL schedules from between 1979-1993 would fit fine since they are a balanced format (6 opponents played 13 times each and the other 7 opponents played 12 times each). The 13 games have a home-away split of either 7-6 or 6-7. There would a total of 52 series.

For the 16-team NL, another option would be to use a balanced schedule which focuses on 3-game series. One method would have 12 opponents played 12 times each and the other 3 opponents played 6 times each. Another method would have 9 opponents played 12 times each, and the other 6 opponents played 9 times each (with the home-away split either 6-3 or 3-6). Both of these methods would have a total of 54 series.

For what it's worth, were MLB to adopt a balanced, non-interleague schedule, the NL's almost certainly would use one of the two methods I mentioned (since MLB prefers to work with 3-game series and keep 2-game series to an absolute minimum).
__________________
.
"We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things not because they are easy, but because they are hard. Because that goal will serve to organize and measure the best of our abilities and skills, because that challenge is one we are willing to accept, one we are unwilling to postpone, and one which we intend to win."
.
Le Grande Orange is offline   Reply With Quote