Quote:
Originally Posted by thomamon
Why are we supposed to believe that varients of 95 were 98 and ME when at the time they were advertised as a new O/S?
|
Speaking strictly as a Mac user, I would assume that was because even though major revisions (10.1, 10.2, Panther, Leopard, Tiger) come years apart and cost hundreds of dollars apiece, they're all still just revisions of OS X (10.0).
Edit: In other words, the underlying architecture didn't change, so while the version has a different name, it's still the same operating system.