|
I have noticed many players have a "0" for various ratings on the 1-200 scale That seems wrong, because 0 is less than 1, and 1 is the bottom of the scale.
Also, a disproportionate number of players have a 1 for a rating, especially for "stuff" and "movement". I totally understand that "1" is valid, because it is part of the scale from 1-200. However, I would think that true "1" ratings should be fairly infrequent.
Some pitchers have no pitches. I don't know what to make of this. I mean, there are some bad pitchers out there, but not THAT bad!
In all cases, the players I have seen play in the Reds farm system. I have not check the other 29 teams.
So my question is, Were those just typos, that perhaps will be fixed later? I've already heard the deal about rosters being done by volunteers, and I can't fathom why anyone would work for free on a product being sold (not given away) to consumers. That being said, should we expect issues like the three I have raised here to be fixed, or will they shrugged off, due to the time-consuming nature of the work?
|