Quote:
Originally Posted by Ragnar
As far as the Tampa raiders SB goes.......How many people kept blabbing about the Raiders O? I think among my friends I was the only one to win money that SB. Tampa came in with a strong D and I knew they'd beat the raiders. It's how it usually works. 21 points for a great O? who cares? they got slaughtered. Sometimes when you get a big enough lead you let up.
|
But weren't you saying that earlier games don't mean much? So what you don't realize is that the Raiders had horrible O, and that's why they lost the Super Bowl! They had bad O in the Super Bowl! It's not the defense! It's the offense that failed to score more than the other team! It's always about scoring more than the other team, so it's always about O!
I really think this is all nonsense. Both are important, and strength in one can compensate the other. There is no such a thing as D over O.