Quote:
Originally posted by cpbeller
well...i have thought about it...thinking about either just keeping 100 game season schedule for a few years yet and raise it to 120-game season with the future expansion, or...just bump it up to 120 game seasons with the next season....
Just not decided yet....
Have you always had 100 game seasons? and are you going to always stay with that number?
Eastmoor's pitcher, Victor Rounds scored a 17-6 win/loss record, out of 25 games started....that is 1/4 of his teams games...that is a good record I would think...especially since the next highest winning pitcher was Lee Panton (NS) at 25 GS, and a record of 16-8. In the Honor League, John Williams went 16-6, with 26 GS...
The question I am asking then...is this (in your opinions, with running 100-game seasons) good numbers? How many 20+ game winning pitchers have you seen in the Metro League?
|
Yes. I've had a 100 game schedule since I started this current incarnation of the Metros. However, in the future I might create a perfectly balanced schedule by hand. If so, I'll have to switch to a 98 or 128 game schedule. But, I have no immediate plans to do that, if ever. I'm pleased with the 100 game schedule I have.
Looks like you have good pitching numbers for a 100 game schedule. They're consistent with mine, especially in the first few seasons. I've found that 16-17 wins is about the norm for top pitching. Your mega-stars will pull out 17-18 victories at times. However, just witnessed the first 20 game winner in six seasons of play. Adam Hale finished 20-5. That's cool because he was generated by the game and not created by me. Then again, he's in a league that saw two expansion teams added two years ago.