|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Minors (Double A)
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 108
|
Fantasy vs historical play
What is the attraction to playing fantasy leagues? To me it seems diminished but there seem to be some quality fantasy leagues with committed owners. Just curious why they chose fantasy over historical?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 5,264
Thanked 372x in 244 posts
|
There's a good discussion on it here. A search of the forums will yield some more.
Real World Setup Vs Fictional Setup I'm curious why you think they would be diminished?
__________________
It takes neither courage nor intelligence to cheer for a team only when that team wins. The true test of a fan's mettle is the same as it is for a player: Were you there when you were needed? |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,498
Thanked 253x in 204 posts
|
The 'I don't like to see George Brett traded for Dickie Noles' sentiment is my #1 reason. People, including me, tend to get frustrated when things happen that would never happen in real life. In fictional leagues, you aren't constrained by what 'should' happen. You can explain anything with a fictional story.
I never played fictional until a joined a fictional online league. It was probably my favorite OOTP experience ever. I really enjoyed making up stories to go along with what happened. Give it a try. I really think the game is set up best to play fictionally and kinda retrofit to play modern rosters and historical.
__________________
PEBA - Duluth Warriors |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
Minors (Double A)
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 108
|
Quote:
I dunno, I guess i figure when one has access to the greats of the past, wouldnt it be more interesting to see them come to life, as it were. When I was younger I got started in board games like strat-o-matic and they used all-star players and real stats. I guess thats my reference. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|