OOTP2009 SkyDog Fictional League Settings - Page 12

thomamon · 11-10-2008, 03:31 AM

Anyone try this with Feeder Leagues?

thomamon · 11-14-2008, 10:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SkyDog

Batter Aging: 2.000
Batter Development: .500
Pitcher Aging: 1.750
Pitcher Development: .500

Just a note, do not use these with feeder leagues

Corsairs · 11-15-2008, 01:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thomamon

Just a note, do not use these with feeder leagues

Why do you say?

The Wolf · 11-15-2008, 11:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thomamon

Just a note, do not use these with feeder leagues

What happens?

Muppetus Galacticus · 11-15-2008, 12:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Wolf

What happens?

Try to imagine all life as you know it stopping instantaneously and every molecule in your body exploding at the speed of light.

Total protonic reversal.

Tony M · 11-15-2008, 01:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thomamon

Just a note, do not use these with feeder leagues

Hence my suggestion for OOTP10 about moving global settings to a league level

Afino · 11-27-2008, 12:26 AM

I'm just curious -

What would happen if you dropped Dev down to .500 or .600 and left Aging at 1.000??

Would players have even longer careers? Or would their peaks just happen later, or worse, shorter?

bschr682 · 04-03-2009, 06:53 PM

just out of curiousity is anyone going to attempt something like this when OOTP 10 comes out?

RchW · 04-03-2009, 09:15 PM

I'd expect Sky Dog will reprise his typically excellent work. However this league will port over to vX just fine I think.

bschr682 · 04-03-2009, 11:55 PM

good. i've been monkeying around with it for the past few hours and i must say its top notch.

giantsfan777 · 05-08-2009, 05:46 AM

i posted this elsewhere but it's more appropriate here... sorry for the double-post guys.

i love skydog's settings but i feel like i never get any really young players in my leagues if i use his settings.

also, i'd like to know if (over a long period) anyone else has noticed that star players get replaced in lineups alot by younger players when you don't use skydog's settings. i mean i get that talent has to be replaced eventually (you'll note that i'm a giants fan) but it's rediculous to see some of the best and highest paid players being put in a platoon or not played at all because of the AI wanting to get young talent in.

so i guess what i'm looking for is a way to do the settings that gives us some clayton kershaws but doesn't push all the tim wakefields out because of it. with skydog's settings i don't get many players debuting before they hit 24 years old. i understand that this is the average debut age in real life (and actually has been for decades), but it seems like i never see young studs come up with his settings. but if i use the standard settings, that's all i get, to the detriment of the veterans.

is there a happy medium out there?

scott07 · 05-09-2009, 01:44 AM

Funnily enough I have been searching to find exactly what you described. In the OP that to me is perfect baseball. I often site 1984 as the perfect baseball year statistically and often have tried to emulate it for every season in ootp and have failed. I will definitely have to use your settings.

scott07 · 05-09-2009, 03:21 AM

Hmmm I really like these settings but have one problem.

I've had 9 starting pitchers in the first 7 years with ERA's under 2.00

giantsfan777 · 05-09-2009, 06:38 AM

just simmed a bunch of seasons with skydog's exact settings and i have to say that i like the progression but the computer still seems to like to take established veterans out in favor of young players and plays up the left/right splits way too much. there is no reason at all why a healthy and still productive miguel tejada should be benched in favor of his successor when he (tejada) is still making over 10 million a year. it would never happen. at the very least the AI should look to trade him away.

i'm going to try to tinker with the AI evaluation settings... make it take the recent seasons into account more as current settings have the AI almost completely ignore recent history in favor of ratings

i'd love to hear opinions from people who think this is either a good or a bad idea.

RchW · 05-09-2009, 01:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scott07

Hmmm I really like these settings but have one problem.

I've had 9 starting pitchers in the first 7 years with ERA's under 2.00

How many starting pitchers in total were there in those 7 seasons?

Afino · 05-09-2009, 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by giantsfan777

just simmed a bunch of seasons with skydog's exact settings and i have to say that i like the progression but the computer still seems to like to take established veterans out in favor of young players and plays up the left/right splits way too much. there is no reason at all why a healthy and still productive miguel tejada should be benched in favor of his successor when he (tejada) is still making over 10 million a year. it would never happen. at the very least the AI should look to trade him away.

i'm going to try to tinker with the AI evaluation settings... make it take the recent seasons into account more as current settings have the AI almost completely ignore recent history in favor of ratings

i'd love to hear opinions from people who think this is either a good or a bad idea.

Also, you can go into commish mode, and go into each team's manager page. From there you can adjust the sliders to "favor veterans" or not favor L/R splits, among other things.

kcroyalgm · 06-10-2009, 11:50 AM

Anyone using NABA with X?
How's it looking?

Ramzavail · 07-21-2009, 03:48 PM

As I said in the other thread, NABA gets corrupt eventually in X. But they are working on it as they have one of my league files.

goldenglove_21 · 08-06-2009, 12:18 AM

I was wondering what the status of this is? And also what development settings are being used for X?

08-06-2009, 12:18 AM	#239 (permalink)
goldenglove_21 Minors (Single A) Join Date: Apr 2002 Posts: 75 Thanked 1x in 1 post	I was wondering what the status of this is? And also what development settings are being used for X? __________________

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

11-10-2008, 03:31 AM	#221 (permalink)
thomamon Global Moderator Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: NJ Posts: 5,146 Thanked 43x in 21 posts	Anyone try this with Feeder Leagues?

04-03-2009, 06:53 PM	#228 (permalink)
bschr682 Minors (Double A) Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Wisconsin Posts: 102	just out of curiousity is anyone going to attempt something like this when OOTP 10 comes out?

04-03-2009, 11:55 PM	#230 (permalink)
bschr682 Minors (Double A) Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Wisconsin Posts: 102	good. i've been monkeying around with it for the past few hours and i must say its top notch.

05-08-2009, 05:46 AM	#231 (permalink)
giantsfan777 Minors (Rookie Ball) Join Date: Jul 2008 Posts: 27	i posted this elsewhere but it's more appropriate here... sorry for the double-post guys. i love skydog's settings but i feel like i never get any really young players in my leagues if i use his settings. also, i'd like to know if (over a long period) anyone else has noticed that star players get replaced in lineups alot by younger players when you don't use skydog's settings. i mean i get that talent has to be replaced eventually (you'll note that i'm a giants fan) but it's rediculous to see some of the best and highest paid players being put in a platoon or not played at all because of the AI wanting to get young talent in. so i guess what i'm looking for is a way to do the settings that gives us some clayton kershaws but doesn't push all the tim wakefields out because of it. with skydog's settings i don't get many players debuting before they hit 24 years old. i understand that this is the average debut age in real life (and actually has been for decades), but it seems like i never see young studs come up with his settings. but if i use the standard settings, that's all i get, to the detriment of the veterans. is there a happy medium out there?

05-09-2009, 01:44 AM	#232 (permalink)
scott07 Minors (Rookie Ball) Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 20	Funnily enough I have been searching to find exactly what you described. In the OP that to me is perfect baseball. I often site 1984 as the perfect baseball year statistically and often have tried to emulate it for every season in ootp and have failed. I will definitely have to use your settings.

05-09-2009, 03:21 AM	#233 (permalink)
scott07 Minors (Rookie Ball) Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 20	Hmmm I really like these settings but have one problem. I've had 9 starting pitchers in the first 7 years with ERA's under 2.00

05-09-2009, 06:38 AM	#234 (permalink)
giantsfan777 Minors (Rookie Ball) Join Date: Jul 2008 Posts: 27	just simmed a bunch of seasons with skydog's exact settings and i have to say that i like the progression but the computer still seems to like to take established veterans out in favor of young players and plays up the left/right splits way too much. there is no reason at all why a healthy and still productive miguel tejada should be benched in favor of his successor when he (tejada) is still making over 10 million a year. it would never happen. at the very least the AI should look to trade him away. i'm going to try to tinker with the AI evaluation settings... make it take the recent seasons into account more as current settings have the AI almost completely ignore recent history in favor of ratings i'd love to hear opinions from people who think this is either a good or a bad idea.

06-10-2009, 11:50 AM	#237 (permalink)
kcroyalgm Major Leagues Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 499 Thanked 11x in 10 posts	Anyone using NABA with X? How's it looking?

07-21-2009, 03:48 PM	#238 (permalink)
Ramzavail Minors (Double A) Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: NY Posts: 187 Thanked 1x in 1 post	As I said in the other thread, NABA gets corrupt eventually in X. But they are working on it as they have one of my league files.