A good aging speed?

BadluckinOOTP · 06-01-2006, 10:57 PM

1.000 apparently is much too slow as players routinely play into their forties, and are still very successful. But do I want to go under 1.000 or over to make aging faster?

Tiger Fan · 06-01-2006, 11:02 PM

You would want to raise the number above 1.00 if you wish for the players to age and lose their skills quicker.

It is on page 69 of the game guide.

http://ootpdevfiles.com/ootp/OOTPBas...-GameGuide.zip

Jeremy Weimer · 06-01-2006, 11:28 PM

Yeah, I made the mistake of putting it on .800 because I thought they'd start detioriating kinda fast and I wanted to see them play into their late 30's like in real life of this era. Then I realized even on 1.000 they were playing well into their 30's and 40's. So I promplty switched back to 1.000 and I'll probably start tinkering with it to get it down some (their playing ages).

Qrusher14242 · 06-02-2006, 02:00 PM

I had Hal Trosky play until he was 47. Of course, he didnt do much at all during the last 5 years or so.

06-01-2006, 10:57 PM	#1 (permalink)
BadluckinOOTP All Star Starter Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: OKC Posts: 1,373	A good aging speed? 1.000 apparently is much too slow as players routinely play into their forties, and are still very successful. But do I want to go under 1.000 or over to make aging faster? __________________

06-01-2006, 11:02 PM	#2 (permalink)
Tiger Fan Hall Of Famer Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Ontario Canada Posts: 5,395	You would want to raise the number above 1.00 if you wish for the players to age and lose their skills quicker. It is on page 69 of the game guide. http://ootpdevfiles.com/ootp/OOTPBas...-GameGuide.zip __________________ Cliff Markle HOB1 greatest pitcher 360-160, 9 Welch Awards, 11 WS titles My current dynasty - Tiger Fan's All Sports Replay: The 1920's Head Coach 2010 North Carolina State (5-7) 2011 North Carolina State (2-2) 2012 North Carolina (0-0) 2008 IFF Portsmouth FC

06-01-2006, 11:28 PM	#3 (permalink)
Jeremy Weimer Hall Of Famer Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Champlin, MN Posts: 3,325	Yeah, I made the mistake of putting it on .800 because I thought they'd start detioriating kinda fast and I wanted to see them play into their late 30's like in real life of this era. Then I realized even on 1.000 they were playing well into their 30's and 40's. So I promplty switched back to 1.000 and I'll probably start tinkering with it to get it down some (their playing ages). __________________ GG - Miami Hurricanes

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

06-02-2006, 02:00 PM	#4 (permalink)
Qrusher14242 All Star Reserve Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: CA Posts: 980	I had Hal Trosky play until he was 47. Of course, he didnt do much at all during the last 5 years or so.