|
|||||||
| Earlier versions of OOTP: Logged Issues All issues that have been logged and given a TT # are stored here until fixed |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Minors (Triple A)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 240
Thanked 9x in 8 posts
|
caught stealing
I'm having much too high a proportion of runners caught stealing. More CS than SB, league-wide, season after season. Historically, SB should outnumber CS by nearly 2 to 1.
There is a preponderance of good catcher arms in the league; more than half are 20 (scale of 1-20), and very few under 15, so obviously I suspect this to be either a cause or a symptom of the problem. I am using Arod-Garlon's random debut DB. Turning up basestealing in league settings only makes it worse; the more aggressively they run, the more likely they are to get gunned down by those 20 arms. I have now manually edited most of the catchers' arm ratings, reducing them so that the league-wide balance appears more even, and have not had a chance to test this yet. But my questions are: • Is this a know issue, either of the game or of this particular DB? • Is there a fix or workaround, or some way of influencing the CS%? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | |
|
Minors (Triple A)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 213
Thanked 13x in 10 posts
|
ya i see that to in a 5 game series a C with a1 arm caught 75% of my runners and most of them are very fast.
__________________
Jonny Go Jays and Astros and Pirates and Phillies![]() Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Victoria, Texas
Posts: 2,997
Thanked 177x in 105 posts
|
Right now my league has a 50.8% SB/CS ratio. This really hurts my team since I built it as a base stealing team. I have had to cut way down on even attempting since my team % is hovering at 45%. There is one team at 60.1%, but the rest of the league is in a range from 40% - 51%.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
All Star Reserve
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 806
Thanked 1x in 1 post
|
I'll go ahead and log it, asking Markus to take a look ... but looking quickly at baseball reference, it looks like the ratio is much less than 2 to 1 for much of baseball history. It's not until the late 60's that you start to see anything even approaching 2-1.
TT#: 3544 Last edited by billethius; 05-09-2007 at 11:41 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Victoria, Texas
Posts: 2,997
Thanked 177x in 105 posts
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
All Star Reserve
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 806
Thanked 1x in 1 post
|
Quote:
1954: ~57% success 1968: ~61% 1983: ~67% 1947 and 1941 also had success percentages less than 60 in the NL (54% and 59% respectively) but had no AL data for CS. I guess > 54% would be defined as close to 60% or more, but it's not until recently that the numbers started to climb above the 2-1 ratio. My larger point was that depending on what year of a database you were using, you could definitely expect to see ratios lower than that. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Global Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Muscatine, IA
Posts: 8,275
Thanked 34x in 2 posts
|
Yep, I just noticed this in our online league. There is a setting in the engine file that allows you to adjust steal success frequency. For now, I've bumped that up to make things more realistic.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|