Angels, Braves, Cubs, Royals, Twins, Phillies, Giants, and Cardinals still available!

kybjones · 09-14-2004, 08:14 PM

MLB Network sims 3 days daily. We are at the beginning of the 2005 season and lost a few owners in the 2004 to 2005 offseason cutover. It has some nice features such as a human player agent, franchise players, a concurrent Japanese League (Nippon), daily simming to allow you to closely monitor your team, and a 20 game spring training schedule, etc.

Currently, the following teams are open with some info on their rosters:

Anaheim -- 74-88 in 2004 (inactive, some changes)
Atlanta -- 89-73 in 2004 (owner quit due to school, in nice shape)
Chicago Cubs -- 85-77 in 2004 (inactive, basically unchanged)
Kansas City Royals -- 89-74 in 2004 (inactive, in nice shape)
Minnesota Twins -- 81-81 in 2004 (owner quit due to time constraints, in nice shape)
Philadelphia Phillies -- 92-70 in 2004 (owner quit due to time constraints, in good shape)
San Francisco Giants -- 73-90 in 2004 (inactive, major upheavel)
St. Louis Cardinals -- 93-70 in 2004 (inactive, basically unchanged)

Visit www.mlbnetwork.net and take a look at the teams. If you are interested, please post your name, email, and AIM on the message boards as a guest.

Erich Ingram · 09-15-2004, 10:38 PM

I went an looked at the league and noticed that teams like Philly and STL are no longer in good shape as they lost a lot of players to free agency due to no owner. Which makes them more in upheaval now than in good shape. Not trying to bring this down but just an observation.

ukhotstove · 09-16-2004, 09:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Erich Ingram

I went an looked at the league and noticed that teams like Philly and STL are no longer in good shape as they lost a lot of players to free agency due to no owner. Which makes them more in upheaval now than in good shape. Not trying to bring this down but just an observation.

I agree some of those teams need major work you only have to look at the Braves they hardly have a roster,I've seen this in a few leagues and just an idea for the commish's of the leagues that during the play offs and before free agency that you advertise like crazy for new GM's and even postpone the end of the season till you fill the GM spots you have open,I don't think I'm the only one that as wanted to join a league but looked at the vacant teams and noticed they have no roster,I'm all for rebuilding a team sheeesh I took the Pirates in the UBL and they were in a poor state but to take over a team that say only as 10 players on it's major league roster is asking for miracles.

benchwarmer · 09-17-2004, 04:51 PM

I have interest in St Louis. I assume by "unchanged" Pujols is still a RedBird!

Erich Ingram · 09-17-2004, 09:52 PM

I wouldn't assume, I would go look. Matt Morris and Woody Williams were both free agents when I looked at them.

09-14-2004, 08:14 PM	#1 (permalink)
kybjones Minors (Rookie Ball) Join Date: Jun 2004 Posts: 42 Thanks: 0 Thanked 0x in 0 posts	Angels, Braves, Cubs, Royals, Twins, Phillies, Giants, and Cardinals still available! MLB Network sims 3 days daily. We are at the beginning of the 2005 season and lost a few owners in the 2004 to 2005 offseason cutover. It has some nice features such as a human player agent, franchise players, a concurrent Japanese League (Nippon), daily simming to allow you to closely monitor your team, and a 20 game spring training schedule, etc. Currently, the following teams are open with some info on their rosters: Anaheim -- 74-88 in 2004 (inactive, some changes) Atlanta -- 89-73 in 2004 (owner quit due to school, in nice shape) Chicago Cubs -- 85-77 in 2004 (inactive, basically unchanged) Kansas City Royals -- 89-74 in 2004 (inactive, in nice shape) Minnesota Twins -- 81-81 in 2004 (owner quit due to time constraints, in nice shape) Philadelphia Phillies -- 92-70 in 2004 (owner quit due to time constraints, in good shape) San Francisco Giants -- 73-90 in 2004 (inactive, major upheavel) St. Louis Cardinals -- 93-70 in 2004 (inactive, basically unchanged) Visit www.mlbnetwork.net and take a look at the teams. If you are interested, please post your name, email, and AIM on the message boards as a guest. Last edited by kybjones; 09-14-2004 at 08:39 PM.

09-15-2004, 10:38 PM	#2 (permalink)
Erich Ingram Moderator Join Date: Dec 2001 Posts: 2,112 Thanks: 7 Thanked 8x in 4 posts	I went an looked at the league and noticed that teams like Philly and STL are no longer in good shape as they lost a lot of players to free agency due to no owner. Which makes them more in upheaval now than in good shape. Not trying to bring this down but just an observation. __________________ Erich Ingram (Rolen17) IOSBL San Diego Aztecs 2010, 2012,2013, 2014 World Series Champions Maelstrom Padres 2026 World Champions eMLB Washington Nationals

09-17-2004, 09:52 PM	#5 (permalink)
Erich Ingram Moderator Join Date: Dec 2001 Posts: 2,112 Thanks: 7 Thanked 8x in 4 posts	I wouldn't assume, I would go look. Matt Morris and Woody Williams were both free agents when I looked at them. __________________ Erich Ingram (Rolen17) IOSBL San Diego Aztecs 2010, 2012,2013, 2014 World Series Champions Maelstrom Padres 2026 World Champions eMLB Washington Nationals

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

09-17-2004, 04:51 PM	#4 (permalink)
benchwarmer Banned Join Date: May 2004 Location: Red Sox Nation Posts: 1,461 Thanks: 0 Thanked 0x in 0 posts	I have interest in St Louis. I assume by "unchanged" Pujols is still a RedBird!