|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Earlier versions of OOTP: Suggestions and Feature Wish List Let us know what you would like to see in future versions of OOTP! OOTPBM 2006 is in development, and there is still time left to get your suggestions into the game. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Major Leagues
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 356
|
Salary Comparison in Trades
With all the new salary options, particularly in terms of structure, I think it would be very helpful to include an "evaluator" tool on the trading screen.
Here's what I mean... Say you select a player from your roster on the trade screen and his salary is $5 million. Then you pick a player from the other team's roster who has a salary of $3 million. The evaluator would display "+2,000,000" to show that the trade would result in a relief of $2 million for your team. Then, say you added another play from the other team's roster who had a salary of $1 million. The evaluator would then show "+1,000,000". Finally, you add a third player whose salary is $2 million. The evaluator would then show "-1,000,000". This would just make putting trades together a little easier. This would especially be true if it would take into account the remaining amount of money left on the players' contracts, as opposed to just looking at the entire value of the contracts. Considering you will have a team budget (not to mention some leagues that have a hard salary cap) it would eliminate some of the guesswork, or at least keep us from having to do the math ourselves ![]() I'd hope that since this is essentially just a glorified calculator, it wouldn't be too difficult to implement. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Houston, TX Warnings: 11
Posts: 2,345
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
All Star Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,190
|
Excel is great, no taking that away from you, but the problem is that most of the time, the game takes up the whole screen and to stop in the middle is a pain. If this thing were on screen as a feature, it would be a great asset. Of course, Excel is a great backup if they don't actualy add this feature.
__________________
The New York Yankees World Series Champions 1923, 1927, 1928, 1932, 1936, 1937, 1938, 1939, 1941, 1943, 1947, 1949, 1950, 1951, 1952, 1953, 1956, 1958, 1961, 1962, 1977, 1978, 1996, 1998, 1999, 2000 American League Champions 1921, 1922, 1923, 1926, 1927, 1928, 1932, 1936, 1937, 1938, 1939, 1941, 1942, 1943, 1947, 1949, 1950, 1951, 1952, 1953, 1955, 1956, 1957, 1958, 1960, 1961, 1962, 1963, 1964, 1976, 1977, 1978, 1981, 1996, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 2,192
|
Hmm - I really like the simple idea of something calculating a +/- for however long the contracts are for the involved players. Perhaps a button that could be selected to generate a small window that would come up on the screen. That way, those that want it can use it, and those that don't, don't.
The raw numbers are easy enough to think about in our heads, but a quick one-button layout would be really convenient and the suggested template of a season by season +/- strikes me as the most realistic way that a front office would view it.
__________________
GM's RULE!!!!! Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: This thread.
Posts: 3,194
|
Quote:
__________________
mrs ria: I hereby dub Sublimity the Glorious Upholder of the 5B3. Current leading vote-getter in the Worst Poster in OT History poll. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | ||
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 2,192
|
Quote:
_________________________________________________ |xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Payroll Comparison After Trade:xxxxxxxxx| |xxxxxxxxxxxxx Team A xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Team Bxxxxxxxx| | 2006: +$1.437m to +$1.821m | -$1.437m to +$1.821m x| | 2007: +$1.759m to +$2.010m | -$1.759m to +$2.010m x| | 2008: +$0.569m to +$0.754m | -$0.569m to +$0.754m x| | 2009: xxxxxxxx*all involved contracts expired* xxxxxxxxx| |________________________________________________| What do you think?
__________________
GM's RULE!!!!! Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: This thread.
Posts: 3,194
|
Quote:
Although if they want to make it easier (on themselves), they could just use the oh so wonderful asterisk to mean incentives are included (for instance, replacing the "to +$1.821m" and so on with an asterisk). At some point, you just have to look at the contracts yourself.
__________________
mrs ria: I hereby dub Sublimity the Glorious Upholder of the 5B3. Current leading vote-getter in the Worst Poster in OT History poll. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|