|
|||||||
| Earlier versions of OOTP: Technical Support Do you have a copy of OOTP Baseball 2006? Are you in need of help and assistance in running the game or do you have errors that you need help in resolving? This is your place! |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Minors (Rookie Ball)
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 31
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0x in 0 posts
|
Doubleheaders still don't work well with 6.03
I just tried the 6.03 patch to see if there was anything new with doubleheader support, but nothing has changed and all the same problems remain. This seems like it could be a relatively simple fix, but I could be wrong.
I've been waiting for this to be addressed for almost as long as I've been playing (since OOTP4). I'm wondering if it is even considered a problem that would be fixed. I stopped playing soon after OOTP5 came out because I was so frustrated by the inability to use real MLB schedules after I put a lot of work into researching MLB schedules and building a schedule importer. I had high hopes for OOTP6, but nothing changed. I thought that the ability to import schedules meant that there was more interest in supporting the use of real MLB schedules (meaning double headers up until the early eighties). Is there a timetable for supporting doubleheaders with OOTP (preferrably OOTP6)? I would be happy with incremental support, with a sequence roughly as follows:
I recognize that there were cases in MLB history where pitchers threw both ends of the doubleheader. I wouldn't be against this happening with OOTP when supported by era settings and pitcher endurance, but the present situation is realistic. Pitcher usage for doubleheaders right now is almost entirely deterministic (except for spot starter) and even when a pitcher throws both ends of a doubleheader he is not affected in the second game by pitches thrown in the first game. I think this is a real defect. I guess if the game is not intended to support doubleheaders, it would be more honest to throw an exception of some kind if two games between the same teams are detected on a day rather than to allow corrupted results. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Scheduleslovakia
Posts: 10,232
Thanks: 4
Thanked 1,179x in 701 posts
|
Keep the faith, brother, and keep preaching to the flock. We'll convert the masses to our ways eventually!
![]() I agree with most everything you said. Personally though, I'd be more than happy if just the fatigue issues and pitcher usage items were resolved. These are the biggest impediments to doubleheaders in the game; the other items could wait for OOTP7 (and probably require a reworking of the game engine to some degree). One point about the attendance boost for scheduled doubleheaders - it shouldn't be consistent through time. The reason scheduled doubleheaders today don't happen is because there is no financial benefit to them. Back when however average attendance was lower, the attraction of a Sunday or mid-week twilight-night twin bill did indeed make it worthwhile for a team to schedule them. The attendance boost feature of a doubleheader should probably be tied to the era settings. The scheduled twin bill was mostly limited to holidays until the early 1920's, after which they began to scheduled more and more frequently. The peak occurrence was during WWII, but in the post-war years the numbers were still high, and exceeded those of the pre-war period by a fair amount in most cases. The gradual trend downwards in the numbers began in the late-1960's, and by the early 1980's the scheduled doubleheader had all but ceased to exist. I've done a bit of work analyzing the effect on attendance of weekday vs. weeknight games, and single games vs. doubleheaders, but the data needed isn't available in a convenient form that I could find. Retrosheet has boxscores back to the late-1960's, but for earlier decades there aren't any so the only way attendance data could be tracked for individual games would be to look up and record the attendance figures from the boxscores printed in The Sporting News. Even this is not pefect, since their boxscores didn't start including attendance figures until after WWII if I recall correctly.
__________________
. "We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things not because they are easy, but because they are hard. Because that goal will serve to organize and measure the best of our abilities and skills, because that challenge is one we are willing to accept, one we are unwilling to postpone, and one which we intend to win." . |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |
|
Global Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Muscatine, IA
Posts: 8,275
Thanks: 2
Thanked 35x in 2 posts
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|