This is a really lame joke

mking55 · 06-25-2004, 11:15 PM

People posted about a bug.
I posted it was still there in 6.03.
Kuffrey posts, "who's seen it" as if I didn't.
Someone else posts they've seen it it 6.03.
Henry posts "I haven't seen it".
I make a wisecrack because of the idiotic comment that implies "If I don't see it, it doesn't exist".
Kuffrey closes the thread.

Yup, another day at the office. Well done Mr. Kuffrey. Guess there is no bug. Sorry to mention it. Forget it. It's not there. I made it up. I confess. You caught me.

SirOrion · 06-25-2004, 11:37 PM

*shrugs*

+1

Enjoy the sig.

Ktulu · 06-26-2004, 12:01 AM

Maybe if you dropped the sarcasm and added something usefull(ie the situation where you are encountering the problem like henry asked) the problem can be discussed properly and the thread wont get locked?

What did you expect?

phenom · 06-26-2004, 07:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ktulu

Maybe if you dropped the sarcasm and added something usefull(ie the situation where you are encountering the problem like henry asked) the problem can be discussed properly and the thread wont get locked?

sounds to me like he already tried that, and it didn't work.

CommishJoe · 06-26-2004, 09:34 PM

Here is the message from Steve that Martin is complaining about:

Has anyone seen this using the latest patch as this thread was started referring to patch 6.01. I've run several short and limited tests offering only the asking amount during FA and had ZERO turndowns. If you have seen this problem w/ version 6.03 let me know.

Now, don't take this the wrong way Martin, because I do like you and all. But, you REALLY flew off the handle on this one. It sounded to Steve like it happened in an older patch, and wanted to confirm it was happening with the latest patch. He wasn't dismissing your opinion just because it was you. Take a deep breath and relax. sheesh

mking55 · 06-26-2004, 10:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CommishJoe

Now, don't take this the wrong way Martin, because I do like you and all. But, you REALLY flew off the handle on this one. It sounded to Steve like it happened in an older patch, and wanted to confirm it was happening with the latest patch. He wasn't dismissing your opinion just because it was you. Take a deep breath and relax. sheesh

Now don't take this the wrong way Joe, but you really don't know what you're talking about. TWO people posted (that means me and 1 other) that there was a bug and some fool posts, "I haven't seen it". So it isn't just my seeing the bug that is questioned, but someone else's too. To me it seems like just another example of refusing to accept the reality of the problems.

You too are a member of this club? Sorry to see this. Oh well.

And no, this wasn't me flying off the handle. It was just me being disgusted once more, that's all.

CommishJoe · 06-26-2004, 10:30 PM

The only club I belong to is the common sense one. The posts before yours were referring to 2 older patches, so he was ensuring it was happening with the latest patch as well. He wasn't discounting anyone's word, nor discounting that the bug existed(there is even a post about it in the beta testing forum). It's called being thorough. Too bad you're too disgusted to see that. Oh well.

mking55 · 06-26-2004, 10:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CommishJoe

The posts before yours were referring to 2 older patches, so he was ensuring it was happening with the latest patch as well. He wasn't discounting anyone's word, nor discounting that the bug existed(there is even a post about it in the beta testing forum). It's called being thorough. Too bad you're too disgusted to see that. Oh well.

You are correct. The posts BEFORE mine referred to the situation before 6.03.

However, The post I refer to came AFTER mine from a Mr. A.J. Holz. It said, and I quote, "Also seeing this not only with in-season free agency, but also regular old in-season contract extensions, also with 6.03." Then came Mr. Kuffrey's comments.

I may be slightly insane but I can follow a thread and read the dates in them to know when something is an old post and something is a newer (after me) post.

This is pointless. I accept that 2 people reporting within minutes of each other seeing the same bug in the same version of the same game doesn't mean it exists.

Just get your last word in. I won't respond. Then this can be done.

Henry · 06-26-2004, 10:48 PM

I'll have the last word since I'm obviously the "fool".

06-25-2004, 11:15 PM	#1 (permalink)
mking55 All Star Reserve Join Date: Jun 2002 Posts: 879 Thanks: 1 Thanked 46x in 21 posts	This is a really lame joke People posted about a bug. I posted it was still there in 6.03. Kuffrey posts, "who's seen it" as if I didn't. Someone else posts they've seen it it 6.03. Henry posts "I haven't seen it". I make a wisecrack because of the idiotic comment that implies "If I don't see it, it doesn't exist". Kuffrey closes the thread. Yup, another day at the office. Well done Mr. Kuffrey. Guess there is no bug. Sorry to mention it. Forget it. It's not there. I made it up. I confess. You caught me.

06-25-2004, 11:37 PM	#2 (permalink)
SirOrion Minors (Triple A) Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Portland, Oregon, USA Posts: 263 Thanks: 0 Thanked 0x in 0 posts	shrugs +1 Enjoy the sig. __________________ I'm not cool enough to have a signature.

06-26-2004, 12:01 AM	#3 (permalink)
Ktulu Hall Of Famer Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: BC Posts: 2,225 Thanks: 185 Thanked 167x in 118 posts	Maybe if you dropped the sarcasm and added something usefull(ie the situation where you are encountering the problem like henry asked) the problem can be discussed properly and the thread wont get locked? What did you expect? __________________ "The ice is getting even more thinner, my friend!"

06-26-2004, 09:34 PM	#5 (permalink)
CommishJoe Global Moderator Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Minneapolis, MN Posts: 5,009 Thanks: 30 Thanked 69x in 40 posts	Here is the message from Steve that Martin is complaining about: Has anyone seen this using the latest patch as this thread was started referring to patch 6.01. I've run several short and limited tests offering only the asking amount during FA and had ZERO turndowns. If you have seen this problem w/ version 6.03 let me know. Now, don't take this the wrong way Martin, because I do like you and all. But, you REALLY flew off the handle on this one. It sounded to Steve like it happened in an older patch, and wanted to confirm it was happening with the latest patch. He wasn't dismissing your opinion just because it was you. Take a deep breath and relax. sheesh __________________ Joe Question to fiance -- How much do you love me? Answer -- So much that we can get our legs tied together, walking 3 legged for the rest of our lives and I'd love it.

06-26-2004, 10:30 PM	#7 (permalink)
CommishJoe Global Moderator Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Minneapolis, MN Posts: 5,009 Thanks: 30 Thanked 69x in 40 posts	The only club I belong to is the common sense one. The posts before yours were referring to 2 older patches, so he was ensuring it was happening with the latest patch as well. He wasn't discounting anyone's word, nor discounting that the bug existed(there is even a post about it in the beta testing forum). It's called being thorough. Too bad you're too disgusted to see that. Oh well. __________________ Joe Question to fiance -- How much do you love me? Answer -- So much that we can get our legs tied together, walking 3 legged for the rest of our lives and I'd love it.

06-26-2004, 10:48 PM	#9 (permalink)
Henry Hall of Fame Join Date: Dec 2001 Posts: 6,455 Thanks: 21 Thanked 163x in 70 posts	I'll have the last word since I'm obviously the "fool".

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode