[silvam14]

Originally Posted by Déjà Bru

Silvam, you will change your opinion when you read my post directly above, having been entered a split-second before yours! Too late to change your errant post, alas.

Meh. I think if that response hurts people's feelings, then it shouldn't be the 'official' response by OOTP employees.

[spleen1015]

Just ban MD and 95% of the rudeness will be eliminiated.

[satchel]

I'd rather not have a release date, than have one which gets moved back three months.

[BruceM]

Originally Posted by Malleus Dei

That's been the OOTP official standard response from official spokesmen to that question for years and years. No one is going to get into any trouble here for repeating it unless the mods have finally lost it completely.

This I totally disagree with.

Steve used it one year and everyone else picked up on it. The years and years part is the forum users, not continuously coming from official spokesmen. It snowballed to the point where it gets overkill now.

Anyway, my point is not to debate it's origin or who said what, but that it's a useless phrase to a new member. It's well past the worn out stage.

[remangiii]

I thought CONN CHRIS resigned his moderator position?

[Malleus Dei]

Originally Posted by spleen1015

Just ban spleen1015 and Bobbuttons and 99.9% of the rudeness will be eliminated.

Fixed.

[Curtis]

Originally Posted by remangiii

I thought CONN CHRIS resigned his moderator position?

According to another recent post, CONN CHRIS has come and gone a couple of times. Believe me, if he wasn't a current moderator, he wouldn't be able to keep that 'global moderator' tag under his name, and he wouldn't be allowed to make official proclamations.

Speaking of 'global moderators', we have a fair few of them floating around (near the beginning of the year I saw four of them post back-to-back-to-back-to-back in a thread), and I'm wondering when they're going to start doing something about moderating this global warming thing I keep hearing about.

[Malleus Dei]

Originally Posted by CONN CHRIS

If a newcomer breaks a posting rule and the moderators are notified or see it the issue will be dealt with. This thread addresses the situation where newcomers are treated quite rudely by a forum vet with no other apparent rule broken.

If I read this correctly, as long as no one breaks the rules, n00bs can be as rude as they want, but no one can dare be rude back to them lest they get a warning. That's wrong.

Like I said, this creates a protected class and is extremely discriminatory. Worst idea ever.

[dave1927p]

Originally Posted by spleen1015

Just ban MD and 95% of the rudeness will be eliminiated.

...MD and the wolf are probably 95 percent...

[Curtis]

Originally Posted by dave1927p

...MD and the wolf are probably 95 percent...

MD and TW and the people responding to them. Frequently the responses are ruder than the initiating statements.

And nobody needs to 'fix' that for me.

[canadiancreed]

Originally Posted by Malleus Dei

If I read this correctly, as long as no one breaks the rules, n00bs can be as rude as they want, but no one can dare be rude back to them lest they get a warning. That's wrong.

That would be wrong if ti was what was typed. Sadly this was read incorrectly.

Originally Posted by Curtis

And nobody needs to 'fix' that for me.

You sure? we could add some racing stripes? put it in flashing neon? Some tricked out rims? It's be like a whole new post!

[bosunmate]

Originally Posted by Curtis

According to another recent post, CONN CHRIS has come and gone a couple of times. Believe me, if he wasn't a current moderator, he wouldn't be able to keep that 'global moderator' tag under his name, and he wouldn't be allowed to make official proclamations.

Speaking of 'global moderators', we have a fair few of them floating around (near the beginning of the year I saw four of them post back-to-back-to-back-to-back in a thread), and I'm wondering when they're going to start doing something about moderating this global warming thing I keep hearing about.

What the heck is a GLOBAL MODERATOR ? I'm telling you this place get's crazier by the minute..

[bosunmate]

Originally Posted by dave1927p

...MD and the wolf are probably 95 percent...

Watch what you say N00b....OOPS I'm sorry I didn't mean it. Oh well to bed without supper again Hmmm.

[bear]

Originally Posted by thbroman

All right, dangit, who the heck is "CONN CHRIS"?
I can't recall ever seeing that forum name before, and yet here you are, with 11,000+ posts.
I hate it when people change their monickers . . . . *grumble*

CONN CHRIS has never changed his name during my time here. He was the first forum member to welcome me aboard back when I joined. I'm another basement denizen and an OOTP 9 noob to boot.

bear

[satchel]

Originally Posted by bosunmate

What the heck is a GLOBAL MODERATOR ?

I think that some moderators only have authority in specific forums.

[bear]

Originally Posted by satchel

I think that some moderators only have authority in specific forums.

You are correct. The term "global" just means that the moderator has the authority to work in all forums, rather than specific ones.

[Sweed]

Originally Posted by Sweed

"When it's tested and ready" actually years ago was the standard response from Steve Kuffrey, OOTP employee, when asked about release of either full version of newest OOTP or any subsequent patches. Not saying someone wasn't being nasty while using the phrase but you will want to take it in the context of their post and the thread. It is an old inside joke so if followed with a smile or if not starting or ending a nasty post it was probably meant in jest. So, the company did use the tested and ready line itself, sometimes in fun and sometimes to someone that badgered the board when the question had already been answered with as much accuracy as possible, ie "spring 20XX".

This is a good topic though started by Chris and is much overdue. There are certainly some folks here that need to be reigned in, no different than most boards I visit on the net. Good to see OOTP try to get a handle on the problem.

Originally Posted by Déjà Bru

Rowf! Bow wow wow! Grrrrr. (No wait, that last one is mgom's.)




Yes, technically correct. The trouble is, noobs don't know that history and standard practice and are liable to take it as curt dismissal. I'm not saying to bend over backwards for them, but unless they are acting ornery, we should go out of our way to welcome them for the sake of OOTP (their game, not necessarily their profits, but they are correlated!).

Which is why I took the time to explain it should be taken in context. The poster said himself that ,paraphrasing now, nobody from OOTP would have ever answered a question that way and so IMO was taking it as an insult. I hoped the original poster that brought it up might come back and read my post and find out the history of the phrase. Perhaps in doing so he may find there was no intent to insult in whatever post he happened to see the remark.

[bosunmate]

Originally Posted by bear

You are correct. The term "global" just means that the moderator has the authority to work in all forums, rather than specific ones.

Thanks to Satchel and Bear for the info..

[Bobbuttons]

Originally Posted by Malleus Dei

Fixed.

This shows how little that piece of garbage knows about my posting style. I have NEVER attacked any new forum member for asking questions. On the very rare occasion I ever respond to a new member asking questions, it's usually in my sarcastic and joking way and only in jest. I've never been confronted by a new member that was offended or ticked at anything I responded to their questions with. This absolutely can NOT be said about MD or The Wolf, or whatever he wants to call himself. Frankly, and I don't get offended very often, I was offended by the quoted post and the actions in highlighted. Despite his never being nothing but an ass toward me in my 8 years on this board, I have never publicly advocated his banning.

[bosunmate]

Originally Posted by Bobbuttons

This shows how little that piece of garbage knows about my posting style. I have NEVER attacked any new forum member for asking questions. On the very rare occasion I ever respond to a new member asking questions, it's usually in my sarcastic and joking way and only in jest. I've never been confronted by a new member that was offended or ticked at anything I responded to their questions with. This absolutely can NOT be said about MD or The Wolf, or whatever he wants to call himself. Frankly, and I don't get offended very often, I was offended by the quoted post and the actions in highlighted. Despite his never being nothing but an ass toward me in my 8 years on this board, I have never publicly advocated his banning.

I guess there's no hope for this marriage, time to pack it in guys...