Line of the week back?

[Mntwins]

I wonder if it is..I always enjoyed that little tidbit of info.

[johnnybourbon]

Originally Posted by Mntwins

I wonder if it is..I always enjoyed that little tidbit of info.

yeah, and 200{#} in 200{#} thread too...or whatever it was called

[zekester91]

Originally Posted by johnnybourbon

yeah, and 200{#} in 200{#} thread too...or whatever it was called

200x before 200x, this year would have been 2010 post before 2010, but it doesn't look like any one started one, I carried that thread last year, but no-longer have time to, so it died....

[satchel]

Originally Posted by johnnybourbon

yeah, and 200{#} in 200{#} thread too...or whatever it was called

I think that thread was, justifiably, determined to be a malicious waste of company resources.

[Jose Cardenal's Afro]

Originally Posted by satchel

I think that thread was, justifiably, determined to be a malicious waste of company resources.

Many threads can be considered a waste of resources, but if you want a place for people to come to........

[zekester91]

Originally Posted by satchel

I think that thread was, justifiably, determined to be a malicious waste of company resources.

if any thread was justifiably a maluicious waste of company resources was Well, who was the last person to post in that thread? as the first one grew so large that is broke the DB and had to be restarted as Well, who was the last person to post in that thread? (II) and is quickly getting ready to do it again. Threads that stay below 54,862 replies and 142,175 views are not really a problem.

[satchel]

Originally Posted by zekester91

if any thread was justifiably a maluicious waste of company resources was Well, who was the last person to post in that thread? as the first one grew so large that is broke the DB

When threads are causing the forum software to malfunction, perhaps we should all reassess our posting strategies. It's all fun-and-games until something like that destroys the whole forum database.

[Sdpm100]

Originally Posted by Jose Cardenal's Afro

Many threads can be considered a waste of resources, but if you want a place for people to come to........

You must have missed the whole "closing of OT" debate of whenever it was. Earlier this year maybe? Can't remember.

Originally Posted by zekester91

if any thread was justifiably a maluicious waste of company resources was Well, who was the last person to post in that thread? as the first one grew so large that is broke the DB and had to be restarted as Well, who was the last person to post in that thread? (II) and is quickly getting ready to do it again. Threads that stay below 54,862 replies and 142,175 views are not really a problem.

Well if that is so, then Andreas must be a two-faced liar that likes massaging people's egos. Guess it shows never to believe anything written on message boards, huh?

[Muppetus Galacticus]

We won't break the board again! We're aiming for the whole internet this time

[bababui]

Originally Posted by zekester91

if any thread was justifiably a maluicious waste of company resources was Well, who was the last person to post in that thread? as the first one grew so large that is broke the DB and had to be restarted as Well, who was the last person to post in that thread? (II) and is quickly getting ready to do it again. Threads that stay below 54,862 replies and 142,175 views are not really a problem.

Poster envy?

[AndrewG]

Originally Posted by Mntwins

I wonder if it is..I always enjoyed that little tidbit of info.

Alot of times things like this are still coded int he game and simply turned "off". (Function turned off)

The question is if this is still int he code, can it be turned back on?

But not knowing the layout of all the algorythms of the code of this game, its easy for me to sugfgest or better put HOPE, its set up as such.

The only time I got invovled with coding it was spagetthi by the time I finished.. serves me right for throwning my flow chart termplate away!

[zekester91]

Originally Posted by bababui

Poster envy?

Yes...

[Mntwins]

So I take it I should not of asked this question.

[zekester91]

Originally Posted by Mntwins

So I take it I should not of asked this question.

It was a good question, maybe missread, but we are board waiting for the release of the day that the release date will be anounced