Anyone Ever Added DH to an Existing League? - Page 2

Left-handed Badger · 10-03-2009, 06:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by conception

Yeah, but the fact that managers have to plan out how they are going to use their players and adjust to the game makes in much more endearing than just sticking a DH in there and letting your offense run on autopilot.

I get that you were being cheeky though. For the record, I really enjoy having one subleague with a DH and one without, because I like the AL/NL difference in styles of play. In my league, however, there is a much larger percentage of interleague play.

I get that argument to some extent. But, even with the DH, a lot of times I essentially have 12, even 13 of my position players regularly getting 2 starts a week. And I almost always use a couple players during the game as a PH/PR/D sub. Hell, the DH has helped my defense. One crappy defensive guy is out. ANd I inevitably get to keep that .200 hitting SS with the glove in the lineup and use him in the lineup in the 9th spot not all that unlike a Pitcher.

Left-handed Badger · 10-03-2009, 06:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cryomaniac

I know you've said before it's very difficult to do, but is there any chance of including the real DH rules? (ie. DH can play the field but they lose the DH). To be fair the OOTP rules probably make more sense, but it would be nice to have the real rules as an option.

What exactly are the OOTP DH rules anyhow? (I've never had to move a DH into the field in OOTP, so I am assuming this has something to do with it)