|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
All Star Starter
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,097
Thanks: 184
Thanked 194x in 115 posts
|
They're anticipating a future catcher shortage?
__________________
"I'm killing time while I wait for life to shower me with meaning and happiness." Please don't beat the dead graphics horse. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |||
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: White Vegas - The party town
Posts: 5,339
Thanks: 628
Thanked 709x in 460 posts
|
Quote:
__________________
Cheers RichW Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,771
Thanks: 894
Thanked 756x in 429 posts
|
Are they playing the position or are they simply listed as that position?
__________________
"Try again. Fail again. Fail better." -- Samuel Beckett _____________________________________________ |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Minors (Single A)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: various
Posts: 82
Thanks: 12
Thanked 1x in 1 post
|
I've had it happen recently. If they appear to hit well (or have ratings that indicate such potential) and field the position of catcher poorly I move them to 1b, 3b, or LF depending on speed and what I need, but it is a problem.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,776
Thanks: 6
Thanked 261x in 198 posts
|
I have seen catchers pile up in the rookie league (or whatever is the lowest level league in the system). I've also seen this with other types of positions as well (because of the 25 man roster limit), though catchers are most prone to it because the game restricts each roster to 2 catchers (except for the lowest level again). The excess (if there is any in the organization as a whole) just tumble down to rookie league. The only way to ensure that the rookie league teams not get way out of balance is to check that your organization as a whole has a balanced distribution of players at each position, but especially catchers.
You said the rookie league was signing these catchers, presumably off the FA list. That is hard to explain. It's been a long time since I allowed the AI to sign and release, so can't think of how that might be happening. You could try releasing them and see if the AI signs them up again. If so, you could consider going in as commissioner and simply deleting these guys from the game. Another thing to try would be turning on Ghost players and see if the AI releases some of the extra catchers, since it won't need them. FWIW |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) | |
|
Hall Of Famer
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) |
|
Minors (Double A)
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: New Durham, NH
Posts: 190
Thanks: 56
Thanked 23x in 16 posts
|
I reduced my roster maximums to 50 players in my Rookie Leagues (I have 2 teams) and now the AI loads up one of the two Rookie teams with catchers and relievers, and I have no infielders or outfielders. I balance them out as best I can but anytime I allow the AI to manage my minor league teams I end up with the same issue. Seems like the program could be written to insure that the teams have at least one or two players for each position. I wouldn't mind if the AI cut some catchers if it could compensate for the lack of players at other positions. I find this to be a big pain in the you-know-what.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,776
Thanks: 6
Thanked 261x in 198 posts
|
Quote:
Are there rookie-league-type players at other positions languishing in the FA list, while all your teams try to play their games with an overload of catchers? If so, the question isn't why are teams "hoarding catchers" but why are they releasing these other players. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) |
|
All Star Starter
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: jackson Hole, Wy
Posts: 1,169
Thanks: 182
Thanked 277x in 222 posts
|
I have always had more middle relief pitchers drafted by AI then catchers. I tend to get a lot of short stops but I don't because they are so versatile.
__________________
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|