|
|||||||
| OOTP 10 - Historical Leagues Discuss historical simulations and their results in this forum. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
All Star Starter
Join Date: May 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,471
Thanked 491x in 204 posts
|
I dare you to best this performance.
The 1871+ replay - thanks Spritze & Nukester! I've been using Spritze DB to play a semi-historical sim, starting from 1871. Something about playing through the 1-man and 2-man rotation eras and 75 errors from your 3B is just kind of fun. Thanks to a post from Nukester that got me interested in the DB. In general, this has been the most successful 1871-present run that I've done. I've been coming back every night to play through a few seasons. The dreadful Boston franchise I was going through the history, and looking at the leaderboards. I noticed that the Boston team (a sort of stand-in for an American Association franchise that later became the Red Sox) had the worst single season winning percentage at a mind boggling .092. I'm playing with FA off, but I cap reserve rosters at 20 players so it forces players into the free agent pool. Plus, the early years of this Spritze DB seems to result in a lot of FA at the beginning of each season. Parity isn't an enormous issue. The Boston Atlantics were 39-45 in 1882, 9-89 (68 games out) in 1883 and 47-65 in 1884. So 1883 appears to be some colossal cacophony of failure, the kind of oddities I love to find in these histories. Charlie Ingraham and the cast of failure The squad was filled with some wonderful players. Dude Esterbrook, Thorny Hawkes, Trick McSorley, Count Sensenderfer, Pop Smith and Live Oak Taylor. The worst batter was C Charlie Ingraham. He had been released by the Baltimore Orioles from their reserve squad and signed on with Boston. (The real Charlie played all of one game in his career.) He helped stagnate the offense with a .152 average and 76 strikeouts in 77 starts. He even pitched 40+ terrible innings for the club. Presumably while his backup, Doc Kennedy (.175) was starting. Charlie made 72 errors to boot, and added 6 more while he was pitching. The worst pitching season, ever But here's the real payoff. Joe O'Rourke had been hanging around the league since a fair showing as a 21 year old starter for Brooklyn in 1872. He played sparingly after his rookie year, before he was traded to Chicago in 1880 and then selected by the Boston Atlantics in the 1882 expansion draft. He had a mediocre year for Boston in 1882, and even represented them in the All-Star game, posting a 10-12 record on the year. Then came the dreadful 1883 season. Joe started 67 games for the doomed 9-89 franchise, going a perfect 0-52. 253 innings, 371 hits, 143 walks, 20 strikeouts, 5.05 ERA and a -55.5 VORP. But worst of all, that big goose egg in the win column. 0-52. O'Rourke would never pitch for Boston, or anyone, after that year. He remained on their reserve until he officially retired in 1888 at the age of 37. And needless to say, he does hold the record for most losses in a season. Last edited by BMW; 06-30-2009 at 01:51 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
All Star Starter
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: at the altar of the baseball god praying for middle infield that can catch the ball
Posts: 1,970
Thanked 65x in 56 posts
|
I believe the real record was 48 losses by John Coleman for the inaugral season (1883) of the Philadelphia franchise that would become known as the Phillies. ( though I think he won 12 games also that year)
Poor John was turned into an OFer after that year though. Though I will say sub-.200 for regular werent really that unheard of back then. Even well below .200.
__________________
-Left-handed groundball specialist -Strikeouts are for wimps |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
All Star Starter
Join Date: May 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,471
Thanked 491x in 204 posts
|
I believe you are correct on both accounts. The real reason why this Boston club was so awful was the extraordinarily high ERAs relative to the era.
With O'Rourke at 5.05 and the other starter at 4.00+ in an era where the league would post a 2.10 ERA (lots of unearned runs!) that would be the main cause. But while below .200 averages were certainly common, here's a list of all the pre-1900 players with at least 70 games at catcher (Ingraham had 77, and for those just joining, a .152 average). It's only 11 players, and Ingraham would rank as the second worst starting catcher of his time. Code:
Cnt Player BA Year Age
+----+-----------------+-----+----+---+
1 Harry Sage .149 1890 26
2 Malachi Kittridge .176 1899 29
3 Jack Boyle .183 1892 26
4 Connie Mack .187 1888 25
5 Jack Ryan .189 1898 29
6 King Kelly .189 1892 34
7 Jack Boyle .189 1887 21
8 Barney Gilligan .190 1886 30
9 George Myers .190 1886 25
10 Morgan Murphy .197 1892 25
11 Barney Gilligan .198 1883 27
Code:
Cnt Player BA Year Age
+----+-----------------+-----+----+---+
1 Will White .136 1879 24
2 Jack Burdock .142 1888 36
3 Will White .142 1878 23
4 Charley Bassett .144 1885 22
5 Henry Easterday .149 1890 25
6 Harry Sage .149 1890 26
7 Redleg Snyder .151 1876 21
8 Frank Barrows .151 1871 26
9 Sam Crane .153 1886 32
10 Al Nichols .153 1875 23
Last edited by BMW; 06-30-2009 at 10:54 AM. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|