Latest News: OOTP 13 Announced with Screenshots & Feature List! Pre-Order Now! - OOTP Baseball 12 Available! - iOOTP Baseball 2011 Available! - Title Bout Championship Boxing 2.5 released! - Inside the Park Baseball Patch 1.03 released, DEMO now available

Pre-Order OOTP 13, Save & Win! | OOTP 12 Off-Season Special, just $19.99!

Go Back   OOTP Developments Forums > Out of the Park Baseball 10 > OOTP 10 - Technical Support > OOTP 10 - Logged Issues

OOTP 10 - Logged Issues All issues that have been logged and given a BZ # are stored here until fixed

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-11-2009, 01:48 AM   #1 (permalink)
Bat Boy
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 6
BZ 3371: Possible world template issue(s) with inaugural drafts

Here's a curiosity that I've noticed in the current OOTP. It occurs when you save a world template that has the inaugural draft option unchecked. What happens is that if you load a template like that, and you opt to check the inaugural draft option, the inaugural draft is scheduled as usual BUT the active roster is still filled to capacity as if the option were unchecked. (The reserve rosters are empty when you do this.)

From what I've seen, the inaugural draft also works differently in this mode, at least when it's just the AI drafting. A Look in the full transactions of the teams after the draft will show that January is littered with "(Player) got drafted by the (Team)" transactions, including occurances where it will list players being drafted from the team that drafted them! (In other words, a "City Team Names" team's transactions would have occurances like "J. Ballplayer drafted by the City Team Names".)

I hope this makes sense. This may not be the most severe of problems but it does seem very peculiar.

For the record, I've noticed this problem with what seems like an OOTP9 template (part of the College Baseball BETA, if you wish to test) and an OOTP10 template I created.

That's all for now. Thanks for reading.
siobhan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2009, 01:49 AM   #2 (permalink)
Hall Of Famer
 
endgame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,076
Thanked 499x in 286 posts
Sorry things are taking a little longer to get to lately. Can you try the template you created in X after installing the next patch and report if this issue is still a problem? Certainly and template created in 9 is problematic, but I'd want to hear more about templates created in X working improperly. Thanks in advance.
__________________
"Try again. Fail again. Fail better." -- Samuel Beckett
_____________________________________________
endgame is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2009, 04:34 AM   #3 (permalink)
Bat Boy
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 6
No worries about the time it took to reply...the only worry I had was that I posted this bug correctly. I will certainly see if this is still occurring when the first patch for OOTP10 is released.

Some additional information that may factor into this: The template I'm using was saved after a new league was created without the inaugural draft, so there are players saved within the template. (There are custom stadiums saved within it too, which is the rationale for saving at that stage.) Anytime I use this template, it will initially give me the same rosters for each team on January 1 of the year I choose. On January 2, the inaugural draft occurs, and then all the things I mentioned with players being drafted from other teams (or their own) happens.

What I didn't realize right away is that, if you also have a reserve roster, and the limit is set at a low number like 15, you can end up with teams being unable to make many of their later picks because their team still contains a large number of players that were originally assigned to them but aren't supposed to be. In a test run without setting budgets, I had a team fail to draft in round 32 and 33 due to roster limits and draft normally in round 34. (They then failed to draft two rounds later only to draft again the very next round.)

So that's my wordy follow-up. Again, I will check to make sure if this still happens with the next OOTP10 release. We'll see if this is a problem they've already worked on and, hopefully, nipped in the bud.
siobhan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2009, 08:51 PM   #4 (permalink)
Bat Boy
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 6
The patch is installed now. However, all the issues noted previously still exist. All the players still begin on their original teams and then those teams draft from each other as if everyone were in the free agent pool, occasionally running out of room when there's a reserve roster set.

I did two tests to see if similar things happened in other circumstances:

If I make a template with no inaugural draft and save it before I create a league, then re-load the template for a new league and turn on the inaugural draft option, it works as it should.

If I make a template with an inaugural draft and save it after I create a league, then re-load the template for a new league and turn off the inaugural draft option, it works as it should with players randomly assigned to teams, and it will always begin with the same players each time.

So basically, the issue only applies to league templates that are saved when teams have players on their rosters.

In summary, when a template is saved from a league where players are initially assigned to teams:
1. None of the players are being automatically released into the free agent pool when the inaugural draft option is turned on.
2. Players in the draft are being selected from the other teams instead of from the free agent pool.

Let me know if this still warrants being looked at or if it's just me saving a template at a strange time.
siobhan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2009, 05:43 PM   #5 (permalink)
OOTP Developments
 
battists's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 17,024
Blog Entries: 7
Thanked 703x in 194 posts
Hi folks,

Thanks for your post, and sorry for the delay in getting back to you. The first few weeks after the release are always pretty busy around here!

I've logged this as bug 3371, and I'll ask Markus to take a look at the issue. However, as you intimated, I'm not sure it's likely to get a ton of attention compared to some other high priority issues...

Thanks!

Steve
battists is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright © 2009 Out of the Park Developments