Home | Webstore
Latest News: OOTP 13 THIRD Update Available: Version 13.3.9! - OOTP 13 Released! Download Now! - iOOTP 2012 Available NOW on the AppStore - Title Bout Championship Boxing 2.5 released!

Download OOTP 13 Now! | Download iOOTP 2012 from the AppStore

Go Back   OOTP Developments Forums > Out of the Park Baseball 10 > OOTP 10 - New to the game?

OOTP 10 - New to the game? If you have basic questions about the game, please come here!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-23-2009, 04:17 PM   #1 (permalink)
Bat Boy
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 13
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0x in 0 posts
Evaluating a player

Hey guys,
I'm an OOTP noob, and I'm having some problems figuring out what to do with a player. He can really rake, but is a serious liability in the field. Its an online league that started in 1871 with 8 teams. I drafted Frank McCarton as a CF in the 1871 draft and played him in various spots in the outfield in his first year. He ended up with 11 errors in 13 games, and a .686 fielding percentage. In 1872 he had 56 errors in 38 games, mostly in LF. His stats fielding attributes are per my scout:
Outfield:
range: 12
error: 5
arm: 7

LF: 3
CF: 5
RF: 4

Now I have two really good players in center and right, so I don't really want to change that, but I need hitting, and Frank can do that. He is also only 18. I've read somewhere, that a player has to have certain attributes to improve their skill at a certain position. And I think I read somewhere else that 1B requires the least amount of skill to learn. So my question is, Should I keep playing McCarton is playing out of position in LF, try him at 1B, or just put him on the bench to pinch hit? His infield ratings are worse than the outfield ones. Note, I really need hitting in my lineup. I also see that errors are more prominent in the 1870's. I'd still like to hear input from you guys though.
hrd12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2009, 10:27 PM   #2 (permalink)
Hall Of Famer
 
Kelric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Greater Boston Area
Posts: 3,983
Thanks: 7
Thanked 46x in 36 posts
If you're playing 1871 baseball, EVERYBODY is going to be making errors. I'd probably stick him in LF and forget about it, but what are his infield ratings? And I assume the rating scale is 1-20?
__________________
Former Co-Commish and owner of the Boston Red Sox, 1783-1144, .609%, of the defunct Overlords Baseball League (1930-48). 17 Division wins, 9 ALCS wins, 5 World Series wins.
Kelric is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2009, 09:18 AM   #3 (permalink)
Bat Boy
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 13
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0x in 0 posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kelric View Post
If you're playing 1871 baseball, EVERYBODY is going to be making errors. I'd probably stick him in LF and forget about it, but what are his infield ratings? And I assume the rating scale is 1-20?
Thanks for the advice Kelric.

His infield ratings are pretty poor as well:
Range: 3
Errors:-1
Arm:1
Turn DP:-1

Yup the rating scale is unchanged so its 1-20.
hrd12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2009, 10:11 AM   #4 (permalink)
Hall Of Famer
 
Kelric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Greater Boston Area
Posts: 3,983
Thanks: 7
Thanked 46x in 36 posts
Ah, yeah, keep him in LF. Never put him anywhere near the infield. Not even when joking around during batting practice.
__________________
Former Co-Commish and owner of the Boston Red Sox, 1783-1144, .609%, of the defunct Overlords Baseball League (1930-48). 17 Division wins, 9 ALCS wins, 5 World Series wins.
Kelric is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright © 2009 Out of the Park Developments