|
|||||||
| OOTP 10 - New to the game? If you have basic questions about the game, please come here! |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Minors (Double A)
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Bensalem, PA
Posts: 142
Thanked 2x in 2 posts
|
Spring Training ???
Why does the game automatically move players to ML from AAA during spring training without your consent ???
I tried to move them back before spring training but 3 players are out of options and have to go through waivers !!! Will the game put the players back on the AAA team and back where I had them set up AND will those 3 go back without going through waivers when spring training is over ???
__________________
12-Outlaws WWBL 2021-24 LWS X-Aces POTD 2027-33 X-Padres UFBL 2012-18 X-Red Sox WBL 2016-20 LWS X-Yankees MLSB 2017-21 - 11-Geo Rebels tMBU 2057-58 X-Brewers MLBD 2025-27 X-Rockies MLBX 2009 X-Phillies iBL 2010 X-Cardinals BSO 2009 X-Mariners MLB 2011 X-Scorpions BLFB 2009-11 Last edited by MightyQuinn; 08-20-2009 at 05:13 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,498
Thanked 253x in 204 posts
|
This is an intentional feature new to OOTP X to prevent teams from stock piling players in the minors that could otherwise be playing somewhere else in the majors. This is realistic as all players on the 40-man roster are invited to spring training in real life.
Some people don't like this change, some do. Personally, I like it.
__________________
PEBA - Duluth Warriors |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,498
Thanked 253x in 204 posts
|
I guess I didn't address the last part. No, the game will not put them back for you. You need to clear them through waivers, then put them back yourself and reinsert them in the depth chart and lineup as with any other transaction.
__________________
PEBA - Duluth Warriors |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Scheduleslovakia
Posts: 9,847
Thanked 1,010x in 586 posts
|
Quote:
__________________
. "We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things not because they are easy, but because they are hard. Because that goal will serve to organize and measure the best of our abilities and skills, because that challenge is one we are willing to accept, one we are unwilling to postpone, and one which we intend to win." . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
Minors (Single A)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 94
Thanked 2x in 1 post
|
Quote:
first off, i know this is an old topic, but i have a question with this response. you say it prevents "stock piling", but it some cases it doesnt. if i have a player on a minor league contract, and out of options who does not make my team out of spring, i have to pass him through waivers. whats makes no sense is, if he is claimed by another club, they can simply place him in THEIR minors. soooo basically you lose the player, but he STILL is in the minor leagues. in fact i dont think the claiming team even has to put him on their 40 man when he is under a minor league contract. makes no sense to me. thoughts? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,498
Thanked 253x in 204 posts
|
Quote:
__________________
PEBA - Duluth Warriors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Scheduleslovakia
Posts: 9,847
Thanked 1,010x in 586 posts
|
Quote:
__________________
. "We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things not because they are easy, but because they are hard. Because that goal will serve to organize and measure the best of our abilities and skills, because that challenge is one we are willing to accept, one we are unwilling to postpone, and one which we intend to win." . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
Minors (Single A)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 94
Thanked 2x in 1 post
|
Quote:
not when under minor league contract, they can demote him without waivers. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Minors (Single A)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 94
Thanked 2x in 1 post
|
thanx for the confirmation though guys, i had to make sure i wasnt missing something. one thing i just realized is, when being called up for spring, it automatically (temporarily) gives you a major league contract, so maybe this loophole wont work for spring? it sure does work during the season though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,075
Thanked 498x in 285 posts
|
I'll have to revisit my test leagues, but I don't recall this being the case. Spring Training wasn't that long ago in my fictional, and I'm certain I had a few players on there, dressed in the ML uniform of course, but still possessing minor league contracts.
__________________
"Try again. Fail again. Fail better." -- Samuel Beckett _____________________________________________ |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Scheduleslovakia
Posts: 9,847
Thanked 1,010x in 586 posts
|
Quote:
Only when removed from the 40-man roster does the contract revert to a minor league contract. A player on the 40-man roster but who is out of options cannot be sent to the minors at the end of spring training because players with no options left can ONLY be on the 40-man secondary roster AND on 25-man active roster simultaneously. If you don't want him on the active roster, then you also have to remove him from the 40-man roster and assign him outright to the minors (a.k.a. an outright assignment). This requires the player to clear waivers. Players who have options remaning can simply be optioned to the minors at the end of spring training (in the real world, MLB clubs actually option players to the minors throughout spring training rather than just at the end of it). This is how it works in the real world. When an outrighted player is claimed off of waivers, OOTP puts that player into the DFA area of the new team, and from there the player is assigned to wherever the club wants. The trouble is that DFA in the real world is used for only one purpose: to remove a player from the 40-man roster immediately while giving the club ten days to figure out what it wants to do with the player. It can either release the player, outright him to the minors, or trade him, in order to fulfill the removal of him from the 40-man roster. But in OOTP the DFA is used as an area to temporarily store acquired players. I think this causes unintended issues. A player claimed off of waivers in the real world goes onto the 40-man roster of the new club automatically, which necessitates removing another player from the 40-man roster to make space (assuming a full 40-man roster). But by OOTP putting the player into the DFA area of the new club, the game mistakenly doesn't realize the newly acquired player still ought to be on the 40-man roster. Being in DFA means he isn't on the 40-man roster, and since he's not on the 40-man, the AI team can then assign the player to the minors without waivers since he was never actually removed from the 40-man roster by the acquiring AI team.
__________________
. "We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things not because they are easy, but because they are hard. Because that goal will serve to organize and measure the best of our abilities and skills, because that challenge is one we are willing to accept, one we are unwilling to postpone, and one which we intend to win." . Last edited by Le Grande Orange; 12-23-2009 at 11:56 PM. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|