|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| OOTP 8/2007: General Discussions Talk about our upcoming version of the game... |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Minors (Single A)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Overland Park, KS
Posts: 68
|
A Few Questions About Schedules in 2007
1) Will 2007 have a schedule generator that will make schedules with different 'off days' for each team....automatically? (I think 2006 would reference a historical schedule if it matched the set-up of the league, if not it would make a schedule, but the schedule would have the same off days for each team.
2) I saw in the changelist that a weather system has been added to 2007. I assume that means that each team location will have weather based on their geographical location. Just wanted to know if the 'weather system' is also extended to cover......rainouts.....and therefore rescheduled double headers??? (probably not, but curious) ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | |||
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Scheduleslovakia
Posts: 6,338
|
Quote:
Quote:
The problem is that there aren't a lot of real-world major leagues to use as sources for schedules. There are plenty of minor leagues to use as sources, but those schedules differ from major league ones in a couple of important ways. Quote:
Postponement rates in MLB aren't just a factor of weather; lots of other variables enter the picture. The percentage of MLB games postponed each year varies from year-to-year but slowly increases the further back you look. In 2004, only 2% of MLB games were postponed (that's 48 out of 2430); in 1975 it was 4% (77 games out of 1944); in 1950 it was 9.3% (114 out of 1232); in 1934 it was 11.1% (137 out of 1232); and in 1919 it was 14.6% (163 out of 1120). Given this real data, one would have to decide if such varying postponement rates should be modelled, or if just the modern-day rate should be modelled. If the historic rates are modelled, then that means the rescheduling is going to be even more complicated. Add to that how should the increased postponement rate be recreated given that it's not strictly weather related. And so on. Not easy questions at all to tackle... which is why rain out won't be modelled in the game any time soon. Someday though perhaps...
__________________
. "We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things not because they are easy, but because they are hard. Because that goal will serve to organize and measure the best of our abilities and skills, because that challenge is one we are willing to accept, one we are unwilling to postpone, and one which we intend to win." . |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |
|
Minors (Single A)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Overland Park, KS
Posts: 68
|
Quote:
I'll look for that third party schedule generator when 2007 is released. I saw one for 2006 somewhere.... ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Scheduleslovakia
Posts: 6,338
|
Neither did I until I sat down and calculated them out. I was somewhat surprised myself. It's a bit time-consuming though since it requires going through a season day-by-day and checking the results against newspaper listings... which is why I only have a relative handful of seasons to report.
![]()
__________________
. "We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things not because they are easy, but because they are hard. Because that goal will serve to organize and measure the best of our abilities and skills, because that challenge is one we are willing to accept, one we are unwilling to postpone, and one which we intend to win." . |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | ||
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Watertown, New York
Posts: 2,887
|
Quote:
Something else for the 2008 list.
__________________
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|