Latest News: OOTP PATCH 9.2.2 released! - OOTP 9 RELEASED! - Title Bout Championship Boxing 2.5 released! - OOTP 2007 receives Editors Choice Award from PC Gamer - Inside the Park Baseball Patch 1.03 released, DEMO now available

Click here to download Out of the Park Baseball 9!

Go Back   OOTP Developments Forums > Out of the Park Baseball 8/2007 > OOTP 8/2007: General Discussions
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

OOTP 8/2007: General Discussions Talk about our upcoming version of the game...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 03-18-2007, 05:35 PM   #41 (permalink)
Hall Of Famer
 
Fallschirmjager's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Posts: 4,017
Quote:
Originally Posted by rahvin View Post
If you look at the team history screen, you can see that he's a career .331 hitter with 4 of the top 10 single season averages, so it looks like he's lost his contact skills, but retained his batting eye. His last top ten average was 6 years previous, so I don't think it's all that unusual.
Oops
I did not even notice his age

I guess he has indeed lost alot of skill
__________________
Fallschirmjager is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2007, 09:48 PM   #42 (permalink)
Hall Of Famer
 
Kelric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Greater Boston Area
Posts: 3,085
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Wolf View Post
I agree completely. 2006 generated players who had ridiculous skill sets for their designated positions and I was hoping that 2007 would be better. With this it sure doesn't look that way.

For 2008, let's campaign for position generation templates so that the game generates middle infielders with middle infielder skill sets and corner outfielders with corner outfielder skill sets, etc.
Blah, where's the fun in that? Light hitting, speedy corner outfielders with great batting eyes are fine with me. I'll even take slow, hulking second basemen who hit 40 homers. It happens sometimes in the game, but not enough that I see it as a problem.
__________________
Co-Commish of the Overlords Baseball League (1930-40).
Owner of the Boston Red Sox, 1029-665, .607% (1930-40).
1930-34, '36-40, American League Eastern Division Champions (10/11).
1936, 1937, 1939. 1940 American League Champions (4/10).
1936, 1937 World Series victors (2/4).
138-104, .570% vs. the New York Yankees.
Kelric is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2007, 10:18 PM   #43 (permalink)
Minors (Double A)
 
bailey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 158
I was hoping to be able to sim until 1970 (to build history) with automatic expansion on and then take over a team. At that point, I wouldn't want any more expansion to occur, nor do I want the dh to be implemented. Any chance an auto expand option until year x can be added? I suppose the workaround is to just delete the teams that get added in 1977 etc.
bailey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2007, 10:47 PM   #44 (permalink)
Hall Of Famer
 
The Wolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Baying at the moon
Posts: 3,434
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kelric View Post
Blah, where's the fun in that? Light hitting, speedy corner outfielders with great batting eyes are fine with me. I'll even take slow, hulking second basemen who hit 40 homers. It happens sometimes in the game, but not enough that I see it as a problem.
In 2006 over and over again I got catchers, second basemen, and shortstops who couldn't hit, which would have been fine, but they couldn't field or throw either, and players like that never make it as far as A ball. I got centerfielders who couldn't field or throw, and any CF like that you fully expect them to be able to hit a ton to make up for it, but nope, they couldn't hit either, or have great speed, but no. I got speedy RF and slow LF, RF with weak arms and LF with great arms. I got third basemen who had no arm strength, which I've never seen in the game. Basically the game generated far, far, far too many players who weren't believable in their alleged positions.

The game should have a template for each position and stay fairly close to it. And if a player can't hit, he should have a much greater chance of being a great fielder, and vice versa.
__________________
__________________

"The main problem we face is that when it's 8 AM in London and 3 AM in New York and midnight in L.A., it's still 1968 to Democrats and 1566 in the Middle East."
The Wolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2007, 10:49 PM   #45 (permalink)
Hall Of Famer
 
The Wolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Baying at the moon
Posts: 3,434
Dola, when I wrote "which I've never seen in the game," I meant in the real game, not in OOTP.
__________________
__________________

"The main problem we face is that when it's 8 AM in London and 3 AM in New York and midnight in L.A., it's still 1968 to Democrats and 1566 in the Middle East."
The Wolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2007, 04:59 AM   #46 (permalink)
All Star Starter
 
Muppetus Galacticus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Where we talk proper English like the Queen innit?
Posts: 1,817
If you are going to do position generation templates it simply MUST be an option.
__________________
Population of Pominville - 87

Canvey Island FC- Back in the Premier League!

Quote:
Hmmmm...A lot of people hate you, you have something to do with the horror business and you are being a "douchebag" to everyone on this forum.

You are Rob Zombie.
Muppetus Galacticus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2007, 09:10 AM   #47 (permalink)
All Star Starter
 
Tycobbler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: 20 minutes from Comerica Park
Posts: 1,415
Quote:
Originally Posted by bailey View Post
I was hoping to be able to sim until 1970 (to build history) with automatic expansion on and then take over a team. At that point, I wouldn't want any more expansion to occur, nor do I want the dh to be implemented. Any chance an auto expand option until year x can be added? I suppose the workaround is to just delete the teams that get added in 1977 etc.

Well what you do is on Jan 1st of your decided year you wish to end auto expansion, you go to Game Setup, and under Options you uncheck the box that reads Automatically expand league.
Tycobbler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2007, 09:45 AM   #48 (permalink)
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,470
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fallschirmjager View Post
I
snip...

But they are power hitters to a man

snip ...

Our friend Eric however has I think its safe to say almost no power
He is good for maybe 10-15 HR a year in modern baseball

snip ...


So we are left with a pretty negative conclusion
Eric Bolton could not exsist in real baseball and I would venture to guess has never exsisted in baseball besides perhaps the dead ball era
But even in that era you would be hard pressed to find a player who walked so much, struck out so much and had such a poor contact hitting skillset

I do not know if this player was edited or appears 'naturaly'
But it is a kind of a shame to be on the 2007 version of the game and still have players who have a skillset completly out of touch with reality
Here is a list of players from 1960-2004 who walked 100+ times, struck out 100+ times, and hit 20 or fewer HR. Not tons, but there are some. If I drop the criteria to go to rate stats rather than pure counting stats (so as to take the GM AI out of the mix), I find more ... and better matches. It is not beyond belief that a player like Eric Bolten could have existed, especially given Bolten's development path, which has already been commented upon.

1993 Phillips, Tony
1976 Wynn, Jimmy
1996 Phillips, Tony
1977 Tenace, Gene
1998 Henderson, Rickey
1971 Mays, Willie
2003 Abreu, Bobby
1999 Abreu, Bobby
1990 Tettleton, Mickey
2003 Cruz Jr., Jose
1974 Bailey,Bob


You can also look at guys like Kevin Youkillis (120K/91BB/13HR in 2006) as a player who exhibits average contact skills and gets most of his value from the walk and plays positions where offense is expected. Or Felipe Lopez (126K/86BB/11HR) as a guy who has mediocer contact skills, high Ks and BBs, and average defensive skills and survives.

Many of our problems with the game spring from our predisposed notions about what is real. The OOTPv2007 player/position profile is not bad overall. That said, the game's model can always be better.
RonCo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2007, 09:57 AM   #49 (permalink)
Hall Of Famer
 
The Wolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Baying at the moon
Posts: 3,434
Quote:
Originally Posted by Muppetus Galacticus View Post
If you are going to do position generation templates it simply MUST be an option.
Of course, as people will demand 3B who can't throw the ball across the diamond.
__________________
__________________

"The main problem we face is that when it's 8 AM in London and 3 AM in New York and midnight in L.A., it's still 1968 to Democrats and 1566 in the Middle East."
The Wolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2007, 09:59 AM   #50 (permalink)
Hall Of Famer
 
The Wolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Baying at the moon
Posts: 3,434
Dola. They will also demand hitless, slow catchers and middle infielders who can't play their positions at all.
__________________
__________________

"The main problem we face is that when it's 8 AM in London and 3 AM in New York and midnight in L.A., it's still 1968 to Democrats and 1566 in the Middle East."
The Wolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2007, 10:18 AM   #51 (permalink)
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,470
Doing more looking, just because I get interested in these things....

From the above list, Tenace and Tettleton obviously had pop--but Tenace was not a Kingman/Dunn kind of guy, and Tettleton's power is heightened by his offensive environment. Both of those guys had very limited contact skills,and essentially moderate power. Cruz Jr had two HR years, but otherwise could not be considered a power guy. Tony Phillips is probably the best match of the list. Bob Bailey would have been a better match for Bolten, but his human managers kept him from getting the plate appearances he would have needed.

Abreu has line-drive power, and contact skills (Good gap and BABIP) to go with his great eye (Excellent Eye) and mega-strikeouts (ugly AvoidK). His All-Star HR performance aside, he has not shown great power (Average Power). That's an odd combination. Probably couldn't happen in a million years.

Wynn was obviously a power guy who fell on a bad year. Mays, of course a HoFer who was nearing the end. Henderson wasa truely unique player. Bolten is obviously no Rickey...but then, no one is.


Here are other modern players whose performance in 2006 struck Bolten at least a glancing blow:

Jhonny Peralta
Curtis Granderson
Hanley Ramirez
Tadahito Iguchi
Chone Figgins
Melvin Mora
Ryan Freel
RonCo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2007, 10:28 AM   #52 (permalink)
All Star Starter
 
Zitofan75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,319
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Wolf View Post
Dola. They will also demand hitless, slow catchers and middle infielders who can't play their positions at all.
Hey Wolf my 2006 league generates too many hitting catchers with cannons for arms, I'll sell you some!
Zitofan75 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2007, 10:52 AM   #53 (permalink)
Hall Of Famer
 
The Wolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Baying at the moon
Posts: 3,434
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zitofan75 View Post
Hey Wolf my 2006 league generates too many hitting catchers with cannons for arms, I'll sell you some!
LOL, that would be funny. Transaction: Benny "The Cannon" Ayala, C, puchased online from the ZBL..."
__________________
__________________

"The main problem we face is that when it's 8 AM in London and 3 AM in New York and midnight in L.A., it's still 1968 to Democrats and 1566 in the Middle East."
The Wolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2007, 10:56 AM   #54 (permalink)
All Star Starter
 
darkenigma510's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: The Wild West
Posts: 1,328
Quote:
Originally Posted by Muppetus Galacticus View Post
If you are going to do position generation templates it simply MUST be an option.
options should be an option
__________________



darkenigma510 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2007, 11:11 AM   #55 (permalink)
Hall Of Famer
 
Fallschirmjager's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Posts: 4,017
Quote:
Originally Posted by RonCo View Post
Here is a list of players from 1960-2004 who walked 100+ times, struck out 100+ times, and hit 20 or fewer HR. Not tons, but there are some. If I drop the criteria to go to rate stats rather than pure counting stats (so as to take the GM AI out of the mix), I find more ... and better matches. It is not beyond belief that a player like Eric Bolten could have existed, especially given Bolten's development path, which has already been commented upon.

1993 Phillips, Tony
1976 Wynn, Jimmy
1996 Phillips, Tony
1977 Tenace, Gene
1998 Henderson, Rickey
1971 Mays, Willie
2003 Abreu, Bobby
1999 Abreu, Bobby
1990 Tettleton, Mickey
2003 Cruz Jr., Jose
1974 Bailey,Bob


You can also look at guys like Kevin Youkillis (120K/91BB/13HR in 2006) as a player who exhibits average contact skills and gets most of his value from the walk and plays positions where offense is expected. Or Felipe Lopez (126K/86BB/11HR) as a guy who has mediocer contact skills, high Ks and BBs, and average defensive skills and survives.

Many of our problems with the game spring from our predisposed notions about what is real. The OOTPv2007 player/position profile is not bad overall. That said, the game's model can always be better.

I dont mind being proved wrong

Bolton looks like a fun player
And I completly missed his age
If he was 27 and had that skillset, things would be slightly different
On that list, did any players have as few extra base hits and as low a batting average as Bolton?
__________________
Fallschirmjager is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2007, 11:12 AM   #56 (permalink)
Hall Of Famer
 
kingcharlesxii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Member #4749 is leaping from tree to tree in Madison, WI
Posts: 2,272
He kind of reminds me of Jeremy Giambi. Same poor average, high Ks and high walks.
kingcharlesxii is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2007, 12:41 PM   #57 (permalink)
All Star Starter
 
Zitofan75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,319
Quote:
Originally Posted by kingcharlesxii View Post
He kind of reminds me of Jeremy Giambi. Same poor average, high Ks and high walks.
You forgot terrible baserunning instincts
Zitofan75 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2007, 12:58 PM   #58 (permalink)
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,470
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fallschirmjager View Post
I dont mind being proved wrong


On that list, did any players have as few extra base hits and as low a batting average as Bolton?
The lack of extra base hits was the most difficult pairing to find--but Henderson, Tettleton, and Tenace were all in the range of 14-17 doubles during their 100/100 k/BB periods. Not quite Boltenesque, but close.
RonCo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2007, 06:23 PM   #59 (permalink)
Hall Of Famer
 
disposableheros's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 4,339
positional profiles are constantly changing and are somewhat arbitrarily assigned. we can find many examples of players who fall "outside the box" at every position. i hope if they ever *are* implemented they are made to be optional. that i dont have a problem with. i have a problem with hardcoding a SS to never hit more than 10 HR, while always being the best fielder on the team.
__________________
2 Wild Cards, 11 Division Champs, 4 League Champs, 3 World Champs, and 3 Best GM awards

Baseball Maelstrom - New York Mets - 180-149 .547
Corporate League Baseball - Coke Buzz - 889-649 .578
Western Hemisphere Baseball League - Santiago Saints - 672-793 .459

Record - 2428-2271 .517
disposableheros is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2007, 08:52 PM   #60 (permalink)
Hall Of Famer
 
Curtis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Watertown, New York
Posts: 2,887
On my teams I edit the player positions to match their fielding characteristics. It's a little labor intensive, but good mental exercise.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by cbbl View Post
And, yes, I admit that OOTP is the greatest of this type game out there and has far more positive about it than negative. I--nay, we--tend to focus more on the negative because that's what derails our experiences. That's what we want to make better.

But really all I want to do is play.

So I'll try harder to be patient and hopefully the board will be patient with me.
And yes, I am still continuing my campaign to promote adding a 'mass select' option to Out of the Park 10.
Curtis is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright © 2008 Out of the Park Developments