|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| OOTP 8/2007: General Discussions Talk about our upcoming version of the game... |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#2 (permalink) | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Slatten Island
Posts: 4,475
|
Yes, you can create your own fields with whatever dimensions & park factors you choose.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
All Star Starter
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: South Shore, Great Lakes
Posts: 1,175
|
I would doubt this has changed. One way or another, the ballpark catagories must have an average, and forcing the average to 100 yourself will be easier to understand than have the game calculate an average of "94" and you then having to know that a 97 is "better" than average.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
All Star Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Victoria, Texas
Posts: 1,183
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
All Star Starter
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,322
|
Quote:
Fictional parks (or even a league that combines real parks from several leagues) make it kind of difficult to do this without entering everything in a spreadsheet then rebaselining, then reentering the numbers into the game.
__________________
For the best in O's news: Orioles' Hangout.com |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
All Star Starter
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,202
|
I second what CBL suggests; I hated going through hours of tinkering over stadium data and then having it wiped out later because I'd forgotten some setting elsewhere that invalidated the bloody universes' output--which happened a lot. After a time I just quit bothering, but never could get past a little resentment that such a significant part of the creation process was so darn difficult to use and enjoy.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|