Latest News: OOTP PATCH 9.2.2 released! - OOTP 9 RELEASED! - Title Bout Championship Boxing 2.5 released! - OOTP 2007 receives Editors Choice Award from PC Gamer - Inside the Park Baseball Patch 1.03 released, DEMO now available

Click here to download Out of the Park Baseball 9!

Go Back   OOTP Developments Forums > Out of the Park Baseball 8/2007 > OOTP 8/2007: General Discussions
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

OOTP 8/2007: General Discussions Talk about our upcoming version of the game...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 01-26-2008, 01:31 PM   #1 (permalink)
All Star Reserve
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Hartford
Posts: 890
Warnings: 1
The AI Prospects and Waivers

Is this ever going to be a focus? 8 team 1 league 3 levels of minors fictional.
1-20 ratings, no scouts or coaches

I shop the first pick of the 2030 draft around.
24 year old Jose Escobar - LF 10 CF 2 RF 5
Current 12-15-6-8-9
Talents 16-16-19-11-9

Boston offers their best pitching prospect:
21 year old Paul Cleveland Endurance 12
Current 8-7-9
Potential 14-13-14

Escobar was just added to the 40 man roster and has 3 options remaining. Cleveland was drafted just last year and is in AAA, not on the 40 man roster.

Boston trades for Escobar and then promptly puts him on waivers. I claim him just to see what happens. No other teams below me attempt to claim him and I am awarded the player 2 days later.

I trade him back for a 34 year old A ball outfielder. They designate him for assignment again and this time no other team claims the player and then they assign him to AAA.

On the 40 man roster in AA is OF Jesus Martinez. He's 30.
Current 8-11-6-10-7
Talent 9-11-7-12-7

2 days after they designated Escobar for the second time they designate Martinez so they can add a MR to the 40 man roster.

Seriously, can this become a focus of development?

A. It's probably a bad trade to start.
B. Why are they designating a player for assignment that they are trading their best prospect for. If the 40 man is full then don't trade a player not on the 40 man for a player who is on the 40 man.
C. Why are none of the other teams claiming this player?
D. Why would they designate Escobar instead of a 30 year old minor league scrub in AA.

I'm on my knees begging. Please improve this.
lynchjm24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2008, 01:15 PM   #2 (permalink)
bp_
Hall Of Famer
 
bp_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 2,407
that is pretty annoying.
__________________
"al Qaeda wouldn't last a day in parts of Philadelphia" - Mayor Michael Nutter
bp_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2008, 07:25 PM   #3 (permalink)
All Star Reserve
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: at the altar of the baseball god praying for middle infield that can catch the ball
Posts: 769
I have to admit the @$$hole in me would probably just keep him rather than trading him back.

Nice to see former Royal GMs getting jobs though
__________________
-Left-handed groundball specialist
-Strikeouts are for wimps

Last edited by Left-handed Badger : 01-27-2008 at 07:26 PM.
Left-handed Badger is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright © 2008 Out of the Park Developments