Latest News: OOTP PATCH 9.2.2 released! - OOTP 9 RELEASED! - Title Bout Championship Boxing 2.5 released! - OOTP 2007 receives Editors Choice Award from PC Gamer - Inside the Park Baseball Patch 1.03 released, DEMO now available

Click here to download Out of the Park Baseball 9!

Go Back   OOTP Developments Forums > Out of the Park Baseball 8/2007 > OOTP 8/2007: General Discussions
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

OOTP 8/2007: General Discussions Talk about our upcoming version of the game...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 04-02-2008, 11:26 PM   #81 (permalink)
Minors (Triple A)
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 241
I'll be waiting for OOTP 10 or OOTP2009 I suppose as I've always waited 2 years to buy the next version since there's only tidbits every other year. Sorry to be this way but I can't see forking out $30 plus for just a few editions each year. Good luck with sales this year though and we'll see yah again next year. If it's any consolation though you got "PureSim Baseball" beat out by a long shot. I just got through testing out their most recent demo and it sucks. Ball animation is about the only thing I'd like to see in OOTP, but, the rest of that game totally looks noobish.
ravinhood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2008, 12:37 AM   #82 (permalink)
Administrator
 
battists's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 14,255
Quote:
Originally Posted by ravinhood View Post
Sorry to be this way but I can't see forking out $30 plus for just a few editions each year.
Hey, no need to apologize for that!

You're just a consumer making a decision, and without ranting about it either.

We're happy if you come back every few years for an "overhaul".
battists is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2008, 09:49 PM   #83 (permalink)
All Star Reserve
 
mgom27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 919
If you have version 8 do you need to buy version 9? Good I get to save money and won't have to buy the Game again intill the 11th Version comes out
It would be nice for a list of the new Features and Options going to be in it like for Spring Training and Minor League Team Contracts with a MLB Team
You also going to wait for W. Studios Baseball-Shawn who did Puresim is helping them make a Baseball Game and Football Game to go up against Football Mogul,NFL Coach and so ob.
__________________
Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr!!!!

Last edited by mgom27 : 04-04-2008 at 07:38 PM.
mgom27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2008, 10:16 PM   #84 (permalink)
All Star Starter
 
Ktulu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: BC
Posts: 1,378
Quote:
If you have version 8 do you need to buy version 9?
No, if you bought version 8 you get version 9 and 10 for free.
__________________
WHBL - Calgary Nighthawks

All-Time Record: 1035-749 .580
Seasons over .500: 11
Seasons under .500: 0

Americas Cup Championships: 2002, 2003
North American League Pennants: 2001, 2002, 2003
NA West Division Titles: 2011
Wild Cards: 2001, 2002, 2003

"The ice is getting even more thinner, my friend!"
Ktulu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2008, 10:19 PM   #85 (permalink)
All Star Starter
 
truthserum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Waterloo Iowa
Posts: 1,369
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ktulu View Post
No, if you bought version 8 you get version 9 and 10 for free.
NOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!! :fallstoknees:

WHY I NOT BUY V8?!?! WHY I NOT BUY V8!?!?
truthserum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2008, 10:30 AM   #86 (permalink)
Hall Of Famer
 
1998 Yankees's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Yankee Stadium
Posts: 6,134
Quote:
Originally Posted by mgom27 View Post
If you have version 8 do you need to buy version 9?
It would be nice for a list of the new Features and Options going to be in it.
You also going to wait for W. Studios Baseball and Football Game.
I think what you are asking is whether version 9 will be that much better than 8 to invest the price of buying the new game (at a discount perhaps for previous buyers, but that's up to them).

The obvious answer is that you are going to have to wait to see what OOTP9 offers and make up your own mind whether the enhancements are worth the price.

Feel free to explain your reference to W. Studios Baseball and Football Game and what that has to do with the rest of your post.
__________________
The 1998 Yankees are considered to be among the The Best Major League Baseball Teams Ever From 1902-2005 by Baseball Almanac. They were 68-20 at home that year (including playoffs and World Series) in the original Yankee Stadium (1923-2008), "Where Players Became Legends."
1998 Yankees is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2008, 11:00 AM   #87 (permalink)
All Star Starter
 
AZTarHeel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,199
I'm amazed at the number of people who get on here and fuss about the product and the price. Paying $30 or $40 bucks for a new version is a pretty smokin' deal if you think about.

I got about four years worth of mileage from OOTP5, which averages out to probably less than a penny per hour of enjoyment. I waited awhile to upgrade just because of personal budget issues. I was content with what I had and didn't necessarily like what I was reading about some of the future updates, but I never got on here and ranted and raved about the company or what they charged. Just stuck with good ol' OOTP5 (until recently) and saved my $$$.

This is still the gold standard for text-based management sims... keep up the good work guys... will I buy OOTP9? Perhaps, perhaps not. But if not, it's because I love what I've got now in OOTP8...
AZTarHeel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2008, 11:21 AM   #88 (permalink)
All Star Starter
 
PSUColonel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,362
I will buy for sure, and am not one who wishes to "rush" the product out the door, but with beta testing so close, or even already taking place, I can't see the harm in giving us a list of proposed features and improvements??? If something might not make it in due to whatever reason, then just say, "hey feature X is up in the air, or even better yet, omit it from the list.


I'd like to hear more about scouting. Frankly I'm afraid about what Steve said about it being revamped. I'm afraid it could be going backwards rather than forward. To me it sounds like they are "simplifying it", which could mean you no longer assign scouts to specific tasks, and it could simply become much the way FOF handles scouting.

Last edited by PSUColonel : 04-04-2008 at 11:49 AM.
PSUColonel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2008, 03:54 PM   #89 (permalink)
All Star Starter
 
SandMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Kenosha, Wisconsin
Posts: 1,869
$30.00 for the game is a steal.....$2.50 a month, less than the cost of a McDonald's double chesseburger and Medium coke ($2.60). I think the game is a bargain and there have been versions that I have bought, yet did not play, but I still feel I got my money's worth of game play.

I would love to see an option that costs $30.00 a year in a subscription. You pay the $30.00 and it is good for 12 months. During that time you get the newest version and all upgrades to that version and if a new version comes around during your subscription period you get that. If you decided not to renew then you just have the latest version without any upgrades or future versions. This will cost the same as buying the new version every year or 16 months but it will support the developers and will allow for better games in the future. To me it is no difference paying and then paying again the next year for the new version but this will allow people wanting to buy the game but deciding they should wait because of a new version. They could get the version in a subscription and then when the new version comes out (if within the 12 month period) they get the new version.

It is a win-win situation for the game player who feels he gets something free, and a bigger win for the developer who keeps a steady cash flow of $30.00 a year from the game player. This would be ideal because it keeps revenue coming in for the developer in times when he is developing and not selling the product, and it benefits the game player because he realizes that if a new version comes out prior to 12 months from the date he makes his purchase he gets the new game.

I personally would gladly do this. I have OOTP2007 now and would pay the subscription to move up to the latest version and for the next version that comes out within the year......after all I can afford to miss a double cheeseburger and soda once a month to get hours of enjoyment from this game.......
SandMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2008, 04:25 PM   #90 (permalink)
Global Moderator
 
ctorg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 9,422
Quote:
Originally Posted by SandMan View Post
$30.00 for the game is a steal.....$2.50 a month, less than the cost of a McDonald's double chesseburger and Medium coke ($2.60). I think the game is a bargain and there have been versions that I have bought, yet did not play, but I still feel I got my money's worth of game play.

I would love to see an option that costs $30.00 a year in a subscription. You pay the $30.00 and it is good for 12 months. During that time you get the newest version and all upgrades to that version and if a new version comes around during your subscription period you get that. If you decided not to renew then you just have the latest version without any upgrades or future versions. This will cost the same as buying the new version every year or 16 months but it will support the developers and will allow for better games in the future. To me it is no difference paying and then paying again the next year for the new version but this will allow people wanting to buy the game but deciding they should wait because of a new version. They could get the version in a subscription and then when the new version comes out (if within the 12 month period) they get the new version.

It is a win-win situation for the game player who feels he gets something free, and a bigger win for the developer who keeps a steady cash flow of $30.00 a year from the game player. This would be ideal because it keeps revenue coming in for the developer in times when he is developing and not selling the product, and it benefits the game player because he realizes that if a new version comes out prior to 12 months from the date he makes his purchase he gets the new game.

I personally would gladly do this. I have OOTP2007 now and would pay the subscription to move up to the latest version and for the next version that comes out within the year......after all I can afford to miss a double cheeseburger and soda once a month to get hours of enjoyment from this game.......
I'd love to do that.

But I can also imagine the intense griping if it took more than a year to come out with a new game, and people complained about not getting their money's worth because of delays, etc.
__________________
THE VERY US ARTISTS - A project for musicians and visual artists

My music


Currently reading:
Thirteen by Richard Morgan


"When the trees blow back and forth, that's what makes the wind." - Steven Wright

Fjord emena pancreas thorax fornicate marmalade morpheme proteolysis smaxa cabana offal srue vitriol grope hallelujah lentils
ctorg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2008, 04:39 PM   #91 (permalink)
All Star Starter
 
zekester91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,086
Quote:
Originally Posted by SandMan View Post
$30.00 for the game is a steal.....$2.50 a month, less than the cost of a McDonald's double chesseburger and Medium coke ($2.60). I think the game is a bargain and there have been versions that I have bought, yet did not play, but I still feel I got my money's worth of game play.

I would love to see an option that costs $30.00 a year in a subscription. You pay the $30.00 and it is good for 12 months. During that time you get the newest version and all upgrades to that version and if a new version comes around during your subscription period you get that. If you decided not to renew then you just have the latest version without any upgrades or future versions. This will cost the same as buying the new version every year or 16 months but it will support the developers and will allow for better games in the future. To me it is no difference paying and then paying again the next year for the new version but this will allow people wanting to buy the game but deciding they should wait because of a new version. They could get the version in a subscription and then when the new version comes out (if within the 12 month period) they get the new version.

It is a win-win situation for the game player who feels he gets something free, and a bigger win for the developer who keeps a steady cash flow of $30.00 a year from the game player. This would be ideal because it keeps revenue coming in for the developer in times when he is developing and not selling the product, and it benefits the game player because he realizes that if a new version comes out prior to 12 months from the date he makes his purchase he gets the new game.

I personally would gladly do this. I have OOTP2007 now and would pay the subscription to move up to the latest version and for the next version that comes out within the year......after all I can afford to miss a double cheeseburger and soda once a month to get hours of enjoyment from this game.......
I could see Markus making sure that the new version only came out every 13 months and only durring the baseball season. The system we have now works pretty well....
__________________
Bobby Bowden must have a hell of a recruiting pitch, "Son if you come on down to Tallahasee, you just might be able to watch me die during practice!"

The road was closed while the Hartford Police Department's bomb squad came and blew up the chicken.
zekester91 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2008, 05:05 PM   #92 (permalink)
Major Leagues
 
BusterKing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Sudbury, Ontario Canada
Posts: 346
How about a lifetime subscription for all the future releases for $100 ?

Bet that would fly!
BusterKing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2008, 05:58 PM   #93 (permalink)
Hall Of Famer
 
1998 Yankees's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Yankee Stadium
Posts: 6,134
I notice the official response to the "This Forum is Dead" thread was to delete it, thereby making the forum seem even deader. LOL. Whatever. I am getting a good feel for whom we are dealing with here.
__________________
The 1998 Yankees are considered to be among the The Best Major League Baseball Teams Ever From 1902-2005 by Baseball Almanac. They were 68-20 at home that year (including playoffs and World Series) in the original Yankee Stadium (1923-2008), "Where Players Became Legends."
1998 Yankees is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2008, 06:52 PM   #94 (permalink)
Major Leagues
 
English_Ray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Not in Basingstoke anymore...
Posts: 487
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1998 Yankees View Post
I notice the official response to the "This Forum is Dead" thread was to delete it, thereby making the forum seem even deader. LOL. Whatever. I am getting a good feel for whom we are dealing with here.
Actually it has found a new home in OT - which is probably where it belongs!
__________________
Visit my Tampa Bay Rays blog:
English_Ray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2008, 07:27 PM   #95 (permalink)
Hall Of Famer
 
remangiii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: At this point, any shade of green will do
Posts: 4,661
That's a neat graphic in your sig, English_Ray.
__________________
Orioles Pride - First Week Recap (11/22)

2005 Winner of LL's Pick the Loser Contest! - 15-0
remangiii is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2008, 09:11 PM   #96 (permalink)
Hall Of Famer
 
1998 Yankees's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Yankee Stadium
Posts: 6,134
Quote:
Originally Posted by English_Ray View Post
Actually it has found a new home in OT - which is probably where it belongs!
Yep. Into the cornfield with that bit of unpleasantness. A bit too close to home, that one.
__________________
The 1998 Yankees are considered to be among the The Best Major League Baseball Teams Ever From 1902-2005 by Baseball Almanac. They were 68-20 at home that year (including playoffs and World Series) in the original Yankee Stadium (1923-2008), "Where Players Became Legends."
1998 Yankees is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2008, 09:38 PM   #97 (permalink)
Minors (Triple A)
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 241
Quote:
after all I can afford to miss a double cheeseburger and soda once a month to get hours of enjoyment from this game.......
Not ME. I wants me double cheeseburgers and extra large french fries instead of the soda I have beer instead. But, your analogy doesn't even come near to the point of not wasting money on something "I" don't NEED". It's like buying a years supply of garbage bags when you already have a years supply in storage. It's just pretty stupid to do so.
ravinhood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2008, 09:52 PM   #98 (permalink)
All Star Starter
 
Ktulu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: BC
Posts: 1,378
Quote:
Originally Posted by SandMan View Post
$30.00 for the game is a steal.....$2.50 a month, less than the cost of a McDonald's double chesseburger and Medium coke ($2.60). I think the game is a bargain and there have been versions that I have bought, yet did not play, but I still feel I got my money's worth of game play.

I would love to see an option that costs $30.00 a year in a subscription. You pay the $30.00 and it is good for 12 months. During that time you get the newest version and all upgrades to that version and if a new version comes around during your subscription period you get that. If you decided not to renew then you just have the latest version without any upgrades or future versions. This will cost the same as buying the new version every year or 16 months but it will support the developers and will allow for better games in the future. To me it is no difference paying and then paying again the next year for the new version but this will allow people wanting to buy the game but deciding they should wait because of a new version. They could get the version in a subscription and then when the new version comes out (if within the 12 month period) they get the new version.

It is a win-win situation for the game player who feels he gets something free, and a bigger win for the developer who keeps a steady cash flow of $30.00 a year from the game player. This would be ideal because it keeps revenue coming in for the developer in times when he is developing and not selling the product, and it benefits the game player because he realizes that if a new version comes out prior to 12 months from the date he makes his purchase he gets the new game.

I personally would gladly do this. I have OOTP2007 now and would pay the subscription to move up to the latest version and for the next version that comes out within the year......after all I can afford to miss a double cheeseburger and soda once a month to get hours of enjoyment from this game.......
This would only work if there wasn't a "new game" every year, but more of a continuous update process similar to the patches to ootp5. It would probably be better for the actual game... there wouldn't be a huge rush to add a bunch of features at once, instead they could be worked on until they were fully realized. Also, Markus would have the opportunity to work on "small things" that under the normal dev cycle aren't worth the resources.
__________________
WHBL - Calgary Nighthawks

All-Time Record: 1035-749 .580
Seasons over .500: 11
Seasons under .500: 0

Americas Cup Championships: 2002, 2003
North American League Pennants: 2001, 2002, 2003
NA West Division Titles: 2011
Wild Cards: 2001, 2002, 2003

"The ice is getting even more thinner, my friend!"
Ktulu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2008, 11:20 PM   #99 (permalink)
Banned
 
Syd Thrift's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 3,113
Quote:
Originally Posted by ravinhood View Post
Not ME. I wants me double cheeseburgers and extra large french fries instead of the soda I have beer instead. But, your analogy doesn't even come near to the point of not wasting money on something "I" don't NEED". It's like buying a years supply of garbage bags when you already have a years supply in storage. It's just pretty stupid to do so.
Except you're not buying garbage bags. You're directly investing in someone's craft. If you choose to spend your $45 this year on a couple nights at the movies, you're essentially saying that you would rather there be a sequel to the Transformers film than a sequel to OOTP9. That there will probably be a sequel to the latter means most people disagree with your purchasing decisions.

I'm not saying you should or shouldn't buy every game every year or two copies if you can afford it or whatever. Markus and Andreas, I am sure, appreciate every cent they get from us, and we in turn will likely appreciate the goodness that will come out over the next couple years from the increased competition. I'm just saying that comparing OOTP to garbage bags is, well, stupid.
Syd Thrift is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2008, 11:28 PM   #100 (permalink)
Hall Of Famer
 
Raidergoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: 39.84 N -84.12 W
Posts: 7,367
Quote:
Originally Posted by ravinhood View Post
It's like buying a years supply of garbage bags when you already have a years supply in storage. It's just pretty stupid to do so.
Oddly, I did this a week ago at Sam's Club, because they were a steal.
__________________
Raidergoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright © 2008 Out of the Park Developments