Latest News: OOTP PATCH 9.2.2 released! - OOTP 9 RELEASED! - Title Bout Championship Boxing 2.5 released! - OOTP 2007 receives Editors Choice Award from PC Gamer - Inside the Park Baseball Patch 1.03 released, DEMO now available

Click here to download Out of the Park Baseball 9!

Go Back   OOTP Developments Forums > Out of the Park Baseball 8/2007 > OOTP 8/2007: General Discussions
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

OOTP 8/2007: General Discussions Talk about our upcoming version of the game...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 04-23-2008, 01:07 PM   #21 (permalink)
Hall Of Famer
 
pstrickert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,779
If milestones cannot be included in the PbP, is it possible a milestone section could be added to the league and/or team home pages? I certainly do not keep close tabs on this stuff, so it would help if I had a "reminder" that players were approaching specific milestones. Here's a screenshot from MLB.com:
Attached Images
 
pstrickert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2008, 08:29 PM   #22 (permalink)
Minors (Triple A)
 
skywalkr2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St Louis, MO
Posts: 254
Quote:
Originally Posted by Markus Heinsohn View Post
The first two examples are planned, but the third one would slow the game down too much, as calculating the special leaders before and after a play takes some time...
Just being silly - but what if you loaded the special leaders for those two teams in temp memory and just figured it temporarily in game? that way you don't have to access all the data. That wouldn't hurt performance too badly I would think... you would just be comparing hits/hrs/etc vs an in memory temp table.
skywalkr2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2008, 09:35 PM   #23 (permalink)
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,463
There's actually 4 things there, and Markus mentioned 3 examples.

First, "Castillo is on an 8 game hitting streak".
Second, "Castillo leads the NL with 23 2Bs".
Third, milestones
Fourth, "And with that he takes over 2nd place on the all time leaderboard".

So if 1 and 2 are examples, and they will be there, then the other "example" is the fourth thing. There's no way that milestones take a long time to gather... the player is there and it mentions how many home runs he has this season, it's a short move to mention that he just hit his 500th HR. The problem would be in saying that he "moved into 2nd place" or something along those lines.

My thought last year, and still remains, is that the game could build the leaderboard list at the beginning of the year and check if anyone had a reasonable chance to take first or second place (like within the single season HR record of breaking the career HR mark or something). If he did, then it would save that "mini-leaderboard" and constantly check when the player or players added another to their stat. Ignore all the little stuff, we care about HRs, hits, wins, Ks.... doesn't matter to celebrate that he just became the all time leader in ABs or BBs.
I've never heard an answer on if that was in any way possible, I just keep bringing it up.
__________________
I don't know about you, but as for me, the question has already been answered: Should we be here? Yes!
Jack Buck, September 17, 2001

It's what you learn after you know it all that counts.

I firmly believe that any man's finest hour... is that moment when he has worked his heart out in a good cause and lies exhausted on the field of battle - victorious. (Vince Lombardi)

I don't measure a man's success by how high he climbs but how high he bounces when he hits bottom. (George S. Patton)
tysok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2008, 11:01 AM   #24 (permalink)
Minors (Single A)
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 91
Quote:
Originally Posted by Markus Heinsohn View Post
The first two examples are planned, but the third one would slow the game down too much, as calculating the special leaders before and after a play takes some time...
So, when you say they are "planned", does that mean they are going to be in 9 or that at some point a patch/OOTP10 will have those back?

Sorry, but I am in the boat with a few of the others in that if the in-game immersion isn't atleast as good as 6/6.5, I just won't buy the game. I haven't really played 2006,07 (didn't buy 8) alot because of the "steril" environment during a game.

Sirhawk
Sirhawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright © 2008 Out of the Park Developments