Will the AI be a little more aggressive in going after decent players on waivers in v10?

PSUColonel · 06-08-2008, 01:40 AM

Sorry, I meant version 9

Sometimes I feel like when there are a few decent players on waivers, there really isn't any interest from other teams, other than the human team. Maybe it's just me.

Bishop · 06-08-2008, 03:28 AM

Not feeling too optimistic of it being better in v9?

StyxNCa · 06-08-2008, 07:29 AM

It does seem like the computer teams just let good players sit either in free agency or waivers. I constantly find myself not signing those players just out of fairness.

Markus Heinsohn · 06-09-2008, 05:40 AM

This is tweaked in V9

jbmagic · 06-10-2008, 05:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Markus Heinsohn

This is tweaked in V9

Tweak the hell out of it.

clamel · 06-10-2008, 06:03 PM

That´s very good Markus.
Looking at Tom Glavine sitting almost a full year in FA, not being signed was really strange...

Happy if this will not happen (at least not with superstars like Glavine)

MizzouRah · 06-10-2008, 06:46 PM

Hasn't this issue been around for years?

I'm with jb.. tweak it, tweak it again, then tweak it some more. After that, tweak it 20 more times to be sure it can't be tweaked anymore.

If that fails, call this guy.

SittingDuck · 06-10-2008, 06:54 PM

It does a good job. I've been robbed - robbed I say - of players I wanted.

PSUColonel · 07-06-2008, 03:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PSUColonel

Sorry, I meant version 9

Sometimes I feel like when there are a few decent players on waivers, there really isn't any interest from other teams, other than the human team. Maybe it's just me.

nope

PSUColonel · 11-03-2008, 06:42 PM

In this very thread Markus said this would be tweaked in version 9. Does anyone really notice an improvement here? I can't really say I do.

PSUColonel · 11-03-2008, 11:45 PM

06-08-2008, 01:40 AM	#1 (permalink)
PSUColonel All Star Starter Join Date: Feb 2002 Posts: 1,362	Will the AI be a little more aggressive in going after decent players on waivers in v10? Sorry, I meant version 9 Sometimes I feel like when there are a few decent players on waivers, there really isn't any interest from other teams, other than the human team. Maybe it's just me. Last edited by PSUColonel : 06-08-2008 at 03:21 PM.

06-08-2008, 03:28 AM	#2 (permalink)
Bishop All Star Reserve Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Tejas Posts: 620	Not feeling too optimistic of it being better in v9? __________________

11-03-2008, 11:45 PM	#11 (permalink)
PSUColonel All Star Starter Join Date: Feb 2002 Posts: 1,362	bump

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

06-08-2008, 07:29 AM	#3 (permalink)
StyxNCa All Star Starter Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Victoria, Texas Posts: 1,184	It does seem like the computer teams just let good players sit either in free agency or waivers. I constantly find myself not signing those players just out of fairness.

06-09-2008, 05:40 AM	#4 (permalink)
Markus Heinsohn Developer OOTP Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Heinbockel, Germany Posts: 9,448	This is tweaked in V9

06-10-2008, 06:03 PM	#6 (permalink)
clamel Major Leagues Join Date: Apr 2008 Posts: 408	That´s very good Markus. Looking at Tom Glavine sitting almost a full year in FA, not being signed was really strange... Happy if this will not happen (at least not with superstars like Glavine)

06-10-2008, 06:46 PM	#7 (permalink)
MizzouRah All Star Starter Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Troy, Mo Posts: 1,675	Hasn't this issue been around for years? I'm with jb.. tweak it, tweak it again, then tweak it some more. After that, tweak it 20 more times to be sure it can't be tweaked anymore. If that fails, call this guy.

06-10-2008, 06:54 PM	#8 (permalink)
SittingDuck All Star Starter Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Richmond, VA Posts: 1,834	It does a good job. I've been robbed - robbed I say - of players I wanted.

11-03-2008, 06:42 PM	#10 (permalink)
PSUColonel All Star Starter Join Date: Feb 2002 Posts: 1,362	In this very thread Markus said this would be tweaked in version 9. Does anyone really notice an improvement here? I can't really say I do.