|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Minors (Rookie Ball)
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 31
|
Historical expansion ??
OK,
I cross Historical expansion at the years they really happend , BUT what will be the difference of crossing in HOLD EXPANSION DRAFT and not doing this. Getting this to be correct historical is of course nearly impossible since trading and stuff will affect this in the years prior to the expansion. Still I wonder what will be the different in putting a X in Hold expansion draft and not. Any takers ??? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,653
|
If you don't have an expansion draft, then when new teams come in, they won't have any players. Unless of course you fill them with fictional players.
There's also a chance they'll sign FA's, but likely won't get enough players to fill out a roster unless you have a lot of FA's in the pool.
__________________
It takes neither courage nor intelligence to cheer for a team only when that team wins. The true test of a fan's mettle is the same as it is for a player: Were you there when you were needed? |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Minors (Rookie Ball)
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 31
|
So actually one MUST have ticked in both boxes or none....
I was thinking in the directions of addding historical players instead of having amateurs draft. I donīt have any amateur draft, but get the new historical players added to the correct teams they made their ML debut in. However I understand that historically teams might protect different players so an expansion draft is a must, based on the "free" players. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|