Importing Players: Peak Season or Entire Career?

sbrylski · 05-05-2007, 08:36 PM

Which do you use to generate your player ratings, peak seasons or entire career?

Which do you feel is better and why?

texasmame · 05-05-2007, 11:39 PM

I've always gone with entire career. Just something about getting the "whole" of the player - good and bad.

swampdragon · 05-06-2007, 12:38 AM

Since the effect is on potential rather than actual ratings, I like to go with Remaining Peak Seasons. That will provide higher potentials. If you're using recalc, it probably doesn't matter much.

05-05-2007, 08:36 PM	#1 (permalink)
sbrylski Minors (Double A) Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 127	Importing Players: Peak Season or Entire Career? Which do you use to generate your player ratings, peak seasons or entire career? Which do you feel is better and why? __________________

05-05-2007, 11:39 PM	#2 (permalink)
texasmame Major Leagues Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Planet Texas Posts: 436	I've always gone with entire career. Just something about getting the "whole" of the player - good and bad. __________________ *CHAMPS AGAIN!!!* GM, Manager and clubhouse attendant - GRANITE CITY KRAZY KATS - World Champs 2000, 2003, 2004 and 2011; Pennants in 2001, 2005. A.L. East Champions 2010. (No seasons 2002, 2006-2009) 2011 Post-Season M.V.P. - Ted Williams (.412 2 12)

05-06-2007, 12:38 AM	#3 (permalink)
swampdragon All Star Starter Join Date: May 2002 Location: The Lonely Mountain Posts: 1,729	Since the effect is on potential rather than actual ratings, I like to go with Remaining Peak Seasons. That will provide higher potentials. If you're using recalc, it probably doesn't matter much. __________________ "The only way to oblige men to speak well of us is to act well." -- Voltaire

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode