|
|||||||
| OOTP Mods Logos, roster packs, historical databases, OOTP tools, FaceGen files... it's all here! |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#22 (permalink) |
|
Hall Of Famer
|
Here's an updated version of GMExcel called version 10.75
It's full of improvements I made a while ago, but I forgot to put it out for people to use, as I wasn't sure if people were even using the tool. This thread tells me they are. ![]() In any case, check it out and feel free to let me know what you'd like to improve. I don't know when I'll do a new version, but my hope is to make the next version a web-based tool for OOTP XI. Last edited by darkcloud4579; 04-25-2011 at 07:01 PM. |
|
|
|
| Thank you for this post: | damientheomen3 (01-26-2010) |
|
|
#23 (permalink) | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 2,729
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 329
Thanked 296x in 174 posts
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 (permalink) |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,440
Thanks: 34
Thanked 104x in 88 posts
|
Am I correct that after first doing this for the teams I don't have to run it each yet to reset the budget? Or should be running this to establish the budget at the end of each season?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 (permalink) | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,440
Thanks: 34
Thanked 104x in 88 posts
|
Quote:
Thanks again for a great tool. It's added a lot to my league. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 (permalink) | |
|
Hall Of Famer
|
Quote:
Glad you've enjoyed using it.
__________________
SLOP: Commissioner FOBL: Marlboro Townies FOFC-FBCB: Kansas Jayhawks ZOMGFL: Colorado Buffaloes Omnivore FBS Computer Ranking |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 (permalink) | |
|
Hall Of Famer
|
Quote:
I think it'd be an interesting tool to use for an online league, as it could make things pretty interesting for sure. Thanks for the compliment!
__________________
SLOP: Commissioner FOBL: Marlboro Townies FOFC-FBCB: Kansas Jayhawks ZOMGFL: Colorado Buffaloes Omnivore FBS Computer Ranking |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 (permalink) | |
|
Major Leagues
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 433
Thanks: 32
Thanked 52x in 32 posts
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 (permalink) |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: South Philly
Posts: 5,848
Thanks: 356
Thanked 289x in 252 posts
|
I have a question, I love the premise of the tool, but I can't seem to get it to work right. What I want, is the market numbers for 1924, but when I input the year in box E(I believe) I get real crazy numbers like 59 and stuff. Am I doing something wrong?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 (permalink) | |
|
Hall Of Famer
|
Quote:
Excellent. Yeah, I like the dynamic nature of it. That's good to know. I'll eventually sit down and work on improvements to the tool, because there are some ideas I have about it going forward. So if you all think of stuff you might want to see, let me know and I'll figure out how to get it in there or whether it's feasible. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 (permalink) | |
|
Hall Of Famer
|
Quote:
The year thing wasn't even made for the market size tool, it was for an older version of it and I grafted it together to make it do that, but like you can see, it's somewhat imperfect really... Another idea is...for older markets, you can perhaps just use a super small modern market rather than the actual one, since back then the media markets weren't as big and radio -- rather than TV -- was the dominant player. That might lower the sizes of the markets for you somewhat. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 (permalink) | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: South Philly
Posts: 5,848
Thanks: 356
Thanked 289x in 252 posts
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 (permalink) |
|
Major Leagues
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 433
Thanks: 32
Thanked 52x in 32 posts
|
Just thought of this...
Is there a way to get initial budgets, based on market sizes and such, for a league just starting off? We'll have no previous season wins or history to go off of, nor a payroll as we are doing an inaugural draft. |
|
|
|
|
|
#39 (permalink) |
|
All Star Reserve
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Topsail Island, NC, USA
Posts: 776
Thanks: 9
Thanked 13x in 10 posts
|
I'm probably missing something obvious, but wouldn't it get the desired result if you entered the market sizes, etc., and then made every team a .500 club with no playoff appearances or championships?
__________________
And ain't that a shame, shame, shame Shame, shame, the way you do Oh, it's a shame, shame, shame Shame, shame on you |
|
|
|
| Thank you for this post: | darkcloud4579 (02-15-2010) |
|
|
#40 (permalink) | |
|
Hall Of Famer
|
Quote:
Another thing I'll mention is, if folks are actually using this tool for online leagues, let me know and we can perhaps work on some way to customize it for you or let me know how you're using it (via PM is fine) as that would be super interesting for me to see how people are using it. This thing has only evolved since 2007 because of people adding their flair to it, since it originally started as something I used for my own solo situations and little else. So any feedback about how you might be wanting to use it, will be instructive.
__________________
SLOP: Commissioner FOBL: Marlboro Townies FOFC-FBCB: Kansas Jayhawks ZOMGFL: Colorado Buffaloes Omnivore FBS Computer Ranking |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|