|
|||||||
| Suggestions for the next version of OOTP Post suggestions for OOTP 13 here! |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Minors (Triple A)
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 215
Thanks: 30
Thanked 20x in 19 posts
|
Some contract ideas...
There are a few things I'd love to see improved for OOTP 13 in the realm of contracts:
1) The ability to restructure a player's contract through an extension. For example, Chris Carpenter signed an extension for the next two years, even though the Cardinals had a $15 million club option on him for next year. By restructuring the option year and adding a second year, the club was able to save an estimated $4 million. It'd be great if I could take a player who was about to have option years come up and sign an extension that allows me to restructure the option years and extend things out. 2) Revamp/revise the contract method. Give the ability to informally gauge what it might take to sign or re-sign a player. Maybe there's something that lets you "feel out" the agent or the player about what it might take to sign them. Set up something where you can contact the player's rep while contract offers are pending to see what the status is. Maybe even give both manager and player/agent the ability to set hard and firm deadlines on negotiating. 3) I'd love to see some more info on what's motivating a player to act the way he is in this arena. Perhaps we need to get a bit more into the player specifics such as motivations and such, but some players take a "hometown" discount to remain with a team. Some also decide on a team because they have great fans or they always field competitive teams. Others hear good things (or bad things) about the manager. 4) Give the ability to designate a time in a minor/major option contract before the player must be called up or become a free agent. Some players go with the 30-day line, but others might go for six months or a year. This can be especially attractive to older players who are just trying to get one more crack at the major-league team before they call it a career. 5) More bonus clause opportunities. Give a bonus if a player bats .280, for example. Or a bonus if the player wins 20 games in a season as a pitcher. Also bonuses if they finish in the top X of award balloting (which I'd like to see added - not just the winners but who the runners-up were in MVP, Cy Young, etc.) 6) Add a poison pill option to contracts. Some clubs put in a "poison pill" option year to player contracts. If the player is traded, this triggers the option year which is both good and bad; it is good because the parent club does not have to pay the poison pill and it gives the player some added security, but bad in that the club has to work around it in order to complete a trade. Others put in an assignment bonus that triggers when a trade happens. 7) Deferred payments to players. Allow a portion of a player's contract to be deferred and paid out over a period of time. (Example: Matt Holliday has a contract that pays $17 mil a year. $2 mil of that a year is deferred and will be paid out from 2020 to 2029. This gives some added fiscal flexibility for teams. It can also backfire - if a team's finances go down the hole, then you have to balance that out. |
|
|
|
| 2 thanks for this post: | Mariners fan 24 (10-20-2011), OBSL Commish (09-13-2011) |
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |||
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: White Vegas - The party town
Posts: 5,339
Thanks: 628
Thanked 709x in 460 posts
|
Quote:
__________________
Cheers RichW Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Minors (Triple A)
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 215
Thanks: 30
Thanked 20x in 19 posts
|
So, if I read correctly, deferring the money does absolutely nothing - all a deferred payment does is set aside the money and it is then paid out later? Looking at How 'dead money' affects major league baseball economics - Page 2 - Los Angeles Times that article, on page two it reads:
"The payments to Ramirez and Jones pale in comparison to the deal Bobby Bonilla worked out. When the Mets released him in 2000, they were still on the hook for $5.9 million remaining on his deal. Needing cash to sign free agents, they asked to defer those payments for more than a decade, with interest." So yeah - I admit I'm no economist or such, so if there is more clarification on this point that would be great.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|