Jump to the web site's main pagePurchase the games online and start to play in a few minutes!
Latest News: OOTP PATCH 9.1.2 released! - OOTP 9 RELEASED! - Title Bout Championship Boxing 2.5 Released! - OOTP 2007 receives Editors Choice Award from PC Gamer - Inside the Park Baseball Patch 1.03 released, DEMO now available

Click here to download Out of the Park Baseball 9!
Search the web
Search this site

Go Back   OOTP Developments Forums > Out of the Park Developments > Talk Sports
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Talk Sports Discuss everything that is sports-related, like MLB, NFL, NHL, NBA, MLS, NASCAR, NCAA sports and teams, trades, coaches, bad calls etc.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 04-02-2008, 05:02 PM   #1 (permalink)
Hall Of Famer
 
bababui's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: los angeles
Posts: 12,150
Warnings: 2
New Batch of NFL rules

All good changes, IMO.

Quote:
• A recommendation to eliminate force-out decisions on pass completions near the sidelines. Now, officials will only have to decide whether a receiver landed inbounds or not. The intended result is more consistency.


• The "Phil Dawson field goal rule." Now, certain field goals can be reviewed by instant replay, including kicks that bounce off the uprights. Under the previous system, no field goals could be reviewed.


• Deferring the opening coin toss. This is similar to the college rule. Previously, the winner of the coin toss could only choose to receive or to kick off.


• A direct snap from center that goes backward will now be treated as a fumble. Previously, it was ruled a false start.


• Eliminating the 5-yard face mask penalty. Now, only the serious face mask will be called (and will be assessed as a 15-yard penalty). The major foul will involve twisting or grabbing the face mask.
__________________
bababui is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2008, 05:07 PM   #2 (permalink)
Hall Of Famer
 
eriqjaffe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Slatten Island
Posts: 4,311
Quote:
A direct snap from center that goes backward will now be treated as a fumble.
Don't all direct snaps from center go backward?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gastric ReFlux View Post
I'm trying to help you here. Eriq is notoriously obscure and we've been working for years at mainstreaming him. All I suggest is that you try to be a bit more lenient with him as he tries to normalize, as I believe supportive criticism will be more warmly received by Eriq than if he is made to feel threatened.
eriqjaffe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2008, 05:14 PM   #3 (permalink)
Minors (Triple A)
 
johnnybourbon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: addison, il
Posts: 269
Quote:
Originally Posted by eriqjaffe View Post
Don't all direct snaps from center go backward?
...great, another thing to lower to that awful percentage that is the exchange rate between Olin "The Most Overrated Center in the NFL" Kruetz and Rex "Tiny Hands" Grossman
__________________
And so we go, on with our lives
We know the truth, but prefer lies
Lies are simple, simple is bliss
Why go against tradition when we can
Admit defeat, live in decline
Be the victim of our own design
The status quo, built on suspect
Why would anyone stick out their neck?
johnnybourbon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2008, 05:18 PM   #4 (permalink)
All Star Starter
 
Go Tribe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,311
* A recommendation to eliminate force-out decisions on pass completions near the sidelines. Now, officials will only have to decide whether a receiver landed inbounds or not. The intended result is more consistency.

Great - now every catch near the sidelines are going to end up in force outs by the dbacks
Go Tribe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2008, 05:21 PM   #5 (permalink)
Hall Of Famer
 
mikev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 3,156
All that, and nothing about the last second timeouts when field goal kickers are lined up?

This is why the NFL sucks
__________________
70% of the earth's surface is covered by water. The other 30% is taken care of by Patrick Willis.


Global Unified Baseball Association - Vice Commish and California Crusaders GM
mikev is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2008, 05:22 PM   #6 (permalink)
Moderator*
 
Erik W.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Montréal
Posts: 3,480
You left out the best rule change: Defenses are now allowed to use wireless communications in the same manner as offenses.
__________________

Formerly known as Azamien
Erik W. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2008, 05:25 PM   #7 (permalink)
Hall Of Famer
 
eriqjaffe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Slatten Island
Posts: 4,311
Quote:
Originally Posted by Go Tribe View Post
Great - now every catch near the sidelines are going to end up in force outs by the dbacks
Not if the the dbacks don't have a runner on first!
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gastric ReFlux View Post
I'm trying to help you here. Eriq is notoriously obscure and we've been working for years at mainstreaming him. All I suggest is that you try to be a bit more lenient with him as he tries to normalize, as I believe supportive criticism will be more warmly received by Eriq than if he is made to feel threatened.
eriqjaffe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2008, 05:26 PM   #8 (permalink)
Hall Of Famer
 
eriqjaffe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Slatten Island
Posts: 4,311
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erik W. View Post
You left out the best rule change: Defenses are now allowed to use wireless communications in the same manner as offenses.
Does shouting count as "wireless communications"?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gastric ReFlux View Post
I'm trying to help you here. Eriq is notoriously obscure and we've been working for years at mainstreaming him. All I suggest is that you try to be a bit more lenient with him as he tries to normalize, as I believe supportive criticism will be more warmly received by Eriq than if he is made to feel threatened.
eriqjaffe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2008, 05:28 PM   #9 (permalink)
Moderator*
 
Erik W.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Montréal
Posts: 3,480
Quote:
Originally Posted by eriqjaffe View Post
Does shouting count as "wireless communications"?
Certainly, but in this case I mean radio receivers in the helmet.
__________________

Formerly known as Azamien
Erik W. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2008, 08:13 PM   #10 (permalink)
Hall Of Famer
 
molarmite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 3,765
• A recommendation to eliminate force-out decisions on pass completions near the sidelines. Now, officials will only have to decide whether a receiver landed inbounds or not. The intended result is more consistency.


Stupid change, now defensive backs can just push the receiver out of bounds while he's in the air and it won't be a catch. Technially, although this probably wouldn't happen unless the receiver is tiny, if he catches the ball 5 yards inbounds, someone could pick him up or catch up in the air and take him out of bounds before he gets two feet down.

• The "Phil Dawson field goal rule." Now, certain field goals can be reviewed by instant replay, including kicks that bounce off the uprights. Under the previous system, no field goals could be reviewed.

Good rule.

• Deferring the opening coin toss. This is similar to the college rule. Previously, the winner of the coin toss could only choose to receive or to kick off.

Not exactly sure what this means, does someone want to explain it more?

• A direct snap from center that goes backward will now be treated as a fumble. Previously, it was ruled a false start.

Also confused on this one, all snaps go backwards and once its snapped the play is started so its a fumble.

• Eliminating the 5-yard face mask penalty. Now, only the serious face mask will be called (and will be assessed as a 15-yard penalty). The major foul will involve twisting or grabbing the face mask.

Another good rule although I'm sure we'll be seeing for 15 yard facemasks now.
__________________


Come join my new real roster league vMLB. We're getting started as soon as v9 comes out

http://vmlb.allsimbaseball3.com/

From the wise mind of Davey Eckstein


"Now all you need is a signature. A quote or initial, perhaps."
molarmite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2008, 08:24 PM   #11 (permalink)
All Star Reserve
 
Big Hugg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 887
Right, because pushing the WR out of bounds before he can get his feet down isn't a good defensive play.

That's always been a stupid rule. Thank god they got rid of it.
Big Hugg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2008, 08:28 PM   #12 (permalink)
Moderator*
 
Erik W.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Montréal
Posts: 3,480
Yeah, I like the change too. Judgement calls are nothing but trouble. Yeah, this will reduce the effectiveness of jump balls on the sideline, but offenses will adapt.
__________________

Formerly known as Azamien
Erik W. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2008, 08:59 AM   #13 (permalink)
All Star Starter
 
Andy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 1,496
Quote:
Originally Posted by molarmite View Post
• Deferring the opening coin toss. This is similar to the college rule. Previously, the winner of the coin toss could only choose to receive or to kick off.

Not exactly sure what this means, does someone want to explain it more?
If a team wins the coin toss, they can let the other team choose whether they would like to receive or kick off.
__________________
My Myspace

My CD Collection

Andy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2008, 02:06 PM   #14 (permalink)
Hall Of Famer
 
bababui's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: los angeles
Posts: 12,150
Warnings: 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy View Post
If a team wins the coin toss, they can let the other team choose whether they would like to receive or kick off.
When Terry Donahue was head coach at UCLA he almost always deferred. Seems to me that the 2nd half choice is many times much more strategically important.
__________________
bababui is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2008, 03:19 PM   #15 (permalink)
All Star Starter
 
Bobble's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: High and outside
Posts: 1,023
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy View Post
If a team wins the coin toss, they can let the other team choose whether they would like to receive or kick off.
Well, they are really choosing to defer their decision until the second half. When the defer, the other team gets their choice for the first half. The original team gets to make the decision of whether to get the ball or take a specific direction for the second half and they get to make that decision at the start of the second half.
__________________
If only I could get behind earlier, I'd have more time to catch up!
Bobble is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2008, 03:25 PM   #16 (permalink)
All Star Starter
 
Faroo6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The Real Northern California
Posts: 1,998
Quote:
Originally Posted by molarmite
"Stupid change, now defensive backs can just push the receiver out of bounds while he's in the air and it won't be a catch. Technially, although this probably wouldn't happen unless the receiver is tiny, if he catches the ball 5 yards inbounds, someone could pick him up or catch up in the air and take him out of bounds before he gets two feet down."
The defense should be allowed to use the sideline, and there is a provision that if a receiver is carried out of bounds by a DB its a catch.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ESPN site
"A receiver now must get two feet inbounds unless he actually is carried out of bounds by a defender after catching the ball."
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anyone broadcasting an A's game
The A's leave 2 men on and fail to score.

Last edited by Faroo6 : 04-03-2008 at 03:28 PM.
Faroo6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2008, 04:23 PM   #17 (permalink)
All Star Starter
 
Giants44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,599
This sideline rule makes no sense to me - great if you are a DB you just push a guy out on anything close.

There is almost certainly going to be a critical call, in a critical game that will be controversial and next year we will read about how they changed the rule back.

odd
__________________
"In a text sim - Immersion is everything"
-Me

"Judge a man not by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character"
-Martin Luther King

"Not everything that counts can be counted, and not everything that can be counted counts."
-Einstein

"The man who views the world at 50 the same as he did at 20 has wasted 30 years of his life."
-Muhammad Ali

"Baseball statistics are like a girl in a bikini. They show a lot, but not everything."
-Toby Harrah
Giants44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2008, 04:26 PM   #18 (permalink)
All Star Starter
 
Giants44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,599
Defer rule?

really, prior to this NFL teams didn't have the option to defer? I would have lost that bar bet.

On the high school team I coach we always defer. I prefer to start on defense and get the ball in the second half. I had absolutely no idea that the NFL had not been playing by this rule.
__________________
"In a text sim - Immersion is everything"
-Me

"Judge a man not by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character"
-Martin Luther King

"Not everything that counts can be counted, and not everything that can be counted counts."
-Einstein

"The man who views the world at 50 the same as he did at 20 has wasted 30 years of his life."
-Muhammad Ali

"Baseball statistics are like a girl in a bikini. They show a lot, but not everything."
-Toby Harrah
Giants44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2008, 09:18 PM   #19 (permalink)
All Star Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,075
Quote:
Originally Posted by Giants44 View Post
This sideline rule makes no sense to me - great if you are a DB you just push a guy out on anything close.

There is almost certainly going to be a critical call, in a critical game that will be controversial and next year we will read about how they changed the rule back.

odd
yea, as opposed to those situations where the ref had to make the decision of if the WR would have landed in or out if not hit by the db, those were just so decisive and clear cut and no controversy ever came of them
yankeesrule is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2008, 11:16 PM   #20 (permalink)
Bat Boy
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 14
Quote:
Originally Posted by molarmite View Post
• A direct snap from center that goes backward will now be treated as a fumble. Previously, it was ruled a false start.

Also confused on this one, all snaps go backwards and once its snapped the play is started so its a fumble.
In this case it was considered a false start... witnessed it first hand against the Eagles, and it made me very very angry.

I've heard "experts" say it was so the offense couldn't trick the defense.. they didn't want teams to be able to snap the ball between the QB's legs to someone behind him or something like that.

edit: I wish I could remember the exact play to explain why it was different than any other QB fumbling a snap, but I can't. I probably couldn't explain it even if I did remember

Last edited by Rain Delay : 04-04-2008 at 11:27 PM.
Rain Delay is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright © 2008 Out of the Park Developments