|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| TBCB General Discussions Talk about the new boxing sim, Title Bout. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#421 (permalink) | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 3,091
|
Quote:
There are 1091 active featherweights, so the cutoff for the 85th percentile is No. 165, the 80th percentile is 218. In a totally dispassionate analysis, I'd say the two guys he beat are somewhere in that neighborhood. But, I don't think Matt is No. 49, that's probably too high. To me, you have to prove you're as good as a Top 50 guy to be in the Top 50 and he hasn't done that yet. Thus, the call to fight a Top 100 guy, which I'd hope would happen in the next year and then we'll know more.
__________________
Precious Roy stands for quality! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#422 (permalink) |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: louisville
Posts: 14,871
|
If you want to make a case that Matt is better than 85% of the division then I would agree but you clearly said Magallon was, which is a joke.
Matt fought a stiff, plain and simple, and wasn't able to get a guy out of there that he should have. But as I've said in every other post, I like Matt but I'm guessing now that he doesn't have very much power and will have to rely on boxing skills. I'm just questioning the "as good as I've seen him comment" when he didn't do what he should have done and gotten a stiff out of there instead of going 10 with him. |
|
|
|
|
|
#423 (permalink) | |
|
Moderator*
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 21,115
|
Quote:
Current number of active featherweights = 1,091 The following are Remillard opponents that are still active: Fighter---boxrec rank---percentile Magallon--------134--------88th J.S. Perez-------229--------80th Manuel Perez----159--------86th Jose Hernandez--109--------91st Oscar De La Cruz-339-------69th Leo Martinez-----247-------78th Edward Valdez---314-------72nd Ricky Alexander--618-------44th Yamin Mohammad-342------69th Even if boxrec's rankings are as flawed as I think they are, the last four opponents are in the upper quarter of what's available world-wide in the division right now. While they are not top flight fighters, they are not plumbing the depths of stiffdom either.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#424 (permalink) |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: louisville
Posts: 14,871
|
Okay I guess if you two want to say a punchy 9-5 fighter is one of the top 15% fighters at that weight and it was a great great win to not stop a guy who Mickey Bey Jr. stopped then I guess I will let you.
Screams irrational fanboydom though. |
|
|
|
|
|
#425 (permalink) |
|
Moderator*
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 21,115
|
I don't see that anyone here has made that claim Mike. Boxrec makes the claim; and flawed though it may be, says he is actualy in the top 12% of active featherwights. I don't think that means that he is any good, but that's where he is in that measurement system.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#426 (permalink) |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: louisville
Posts: 14,871
|
Read Thunder's post he said it was the best he had ever seen Matt ... my comment was that if that was the best he has been (not stopping a stiff) then that is pretty sad ... then he started trying to justify it.
Oh well I'm done ... you guys continue your little love in .... |
|
|
|
|
|
#427 (permalink) | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 3,091
|
Quote:
Yes I did and I'd do it again. Losing to undefeated Mickey Bey doesn't make one a stiff and at 22, I doubt he's punchy.
__________________
Precious Roy stands for quality! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#428 (permalink) |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: East Haven, CT
Posts: 11,531
|
While I'm by no means on the Remillard bandwagon, I will say that Magallon is no stiff - at least not on Friday night. He pressed forward for most of the fight and took Remillard's best punches. Even after going down once, he continued to come forward and throw punches.
While I did not see much of the pre-injury Remillard and have not been in attendance at any of his public workouts, he is a good fighter. Outside of Chad Dawson, there is slim pickings for homegrown fighters here in Connecticut. Overall, I'm not really a big fan of the lower weight classes, mostly because the little guys really don't punch hard enough to hurt each other with true KO power. That being said (only my opinion), Remillard is a very accurate puncher and throws nice combinations. I still think he needs a few more "easy" fights to regain the form he had before his injury. At 22, he still has a lot of time to improve. Only time will tell.
__________________
UTBA-II Tomato City: [1-2-0] Week 1 MVP: Davey Moore 2-0-0 (1) Week 2 MVP: Paul Fujii 2-0-0 (2) Week 3 MVP: Lee Ramage 2-0-0 (0) |
|
|
|
|
|
#429 (permalink) |
|
Minors (Double A)
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 119
|
Hey Chris been reinstated i'll give you a call and tell you all about it "you will never believe the problem". I guess i am one off the love in,s <Bill>
LENNOX LEWIS one off the great fighters and i am a fan of the 70,s one of the greatest era in boxing bar none.Yes i am an oldtimer but i do know when boxing was great. |
|
|
|
|
|
#431 (permalink) |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: East Haven, CT
Posts: 11,531
|
Chad Dawson gives up WBC belt
Dawson gives up WBC belt;
Diaconu now lightheavy champ! Friday, July 11 2008 Chad Dawson has informed the WBC that he will not defend his WBC light heavyweight championship against Adrian Diaconu and therefore is relinquishing the title. Both fighters had gone to a purse offer that was won by Romanian promoter Gangkor Promotions. The WBC has released the following statement: The WBC feels very disillusioned with Dawson’s decision, as he was going to make the highest purse of his life against Diaconu, as well as the WBC always supporting Dawson since he won the WBC Continental Americas title in 2003 and later asking permission to the organization not to fight Adrian Diaconu in a final elimination bout, but be allowed to fight directly against Tomasz Adamek for the title in a voluntary defense, which the WBC accepted and to become the WBC champion of the world in 2007. Once again the WBC supported Chad Dawson allowing him to make a voluntary defense against Glen Johnson, in which Chad Dawson signed a letter agreeing to fight Diaconu next. It happens that he found the way not to fight Diaconu again. It seems that the reason for Dawson not to comply with the WBC Rules is because a commitment that he has with a television network, which is apparently interfering with the rights and infrastructure of the WBC, which must be addressed in the near future. Wow - I really have lost a lot of respect for Chad Dawson. I was kind of down on him after his punk attitute after his win against Glen Johnson. He looked terrible in the fight and Glen Johnson desverves a rematch, which Dawson refused. Now he's ducking Diaconu again and pissing his title away. Bad day for boxing in Connecticut.
__________________
UTBA-II Tomato City: [1-2-0] Week 1 MVP: Davey Moore 2-0-0 (1) Week 2 MVP: Paul Fujii 2-0-0 (2) Week 3 MVP: Lee Ramage 2-0-0 (0) |
|
|
|
|
|
#433 (permalink) |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 3,091
|
Uh-boy
Not quite CT, but close . . . and mildly amusing
Open Letter to Chris Arreola From U.S. Olympian Jason Estrada For Immediate Release Dear Chris, Congratulations on your win last weekend against Chazz Whitherspoon. I honestly didn’t agree with the referee’s decision to disqualify Chazz. Hell, I really wasn’t impressed by anything you did. I think it’s time for us to determine who America’s top heavyweight prospect is. There’s been a lot of hype about you being the “Nightmare,” but you’ve never fought anybody quite like “Big Six.” Chris, I had an understanding that if Chazz had beaten you, he was going to fight me next. I am going to be world [COLOR=blue ! important][COLOR=blue ! important]heavyweight [COLOR=blue ! important]champion[/color][/color][/color] and I’m willing and able to fight anybody who is in my way, including you, Chris. I’m calling you out, brother. I know you want to be heavyweight champ, too, so try and go through me instead of taking the easy way out. I’ve been minding my business, fighting anybody my promoter Jimmy Burchfield has put in front of me. None of them have had a losing record and the combined record of my opponents when they fought me is 203-73-9. Nine of your 24 opponents had losing records, 256-180-21 overall. There are a lot of cupcakes and tomato cans on your resume. My opponents had a winning percentage of 71-percent, yours is only 56-percent. Can you spell PROTECTED? I’ve sat back and watched other so-called prospects like you fighting stiff after stiff. And somehow the media has bought into you being the “Nightmare” because you’ve knocked out so many of these guys. You’re a strong club-fighter, that’s it, at least until you beat somebody like me, a [COLOR=blue ! important][COLOR=blue ! important]boxer[/color][/color] whose skills you’ve never been in against. I have one loss on my record because I was willing to fight in the other guy’s (Travis Walker) hometown. He had 20 pro fights, I only had six, and I hurt my shoulder early in the fight. Yet, I still almost pulled off a victory. I’m ready to fight you to prove I’m America’s No. 1 heavyweight hope. Chris, let’s make it happen. All of the top rated heavyweights are tied up for months, anyway. Who’s out there for you other than more ready-made opponents? Styles make fights and fans always love to watch a puncher like you fight a boxer like me. Supposedly, I can’t punch, so just get into the ring with me and find out what I have -- great whiskers and the fastest hands in our division. You’re supposed to be the “Nightmare.” Try and scare me; I dare you, Chris. Sincerely, Jason “Big Six” Estrada 2004 U.S. Olympian Future World Heavyweight Champion
__________________
Precious Roy stands for quality! |
|
|
|
|
|
#434 (permalink) | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 3,091
|
Quote:
__________________
Precious Roy stands for quality! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#436 (permalink) |
|
All Star Reserve
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Toms River, NJ
Posts: 545
|
Which State Has Produced the Most Champions?
Does anyone know? I'm not talking about WBO type stuff, but recognizable title holders? I'm assuming New York, but I could be wrong. When I say "state" I'm talking about the state the fighter lived and trained in during his career - not necessarily where he was born.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#437 (permalink) | |
|
Moderator*
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 21,115
|
Quote:
Someone, somewhere must have compiled this. In fact, I would be shocked if it hasn't appeared in the pages of the Ring somewhere along the way.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#438 (permalink) |
|
All Star Reserve
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Toms River, NJ
Posts: 545
|
The Ring did an ethnic fighter special about 20 years ago that was great. Italian, Jewish, German American fighters were featured. It seems that NY State dominated the boxing scene for years. There was the NYSAC World heavyweight title that was considered to be THE TITLE for a period of time.
I don't ever recall seeing an article about it, though. I'm sure the East Coast has produced more champs than the West Coast, but that's because the East was settled/established first. |
|
|
|
|
|
#439 (permalink) |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 3,091
|
That's a great line
Fights at Twin River, R.I., Aug. 22. I think at one time it was going to be Peter Manfredo, Jr.-Joey Spina II, but Manfredo is fighting someone else . . . I'm really itching to see some fights, but no local presence right now, so very doubtful
__________________
Precious Roy stands for quality! |
|
|
|
|
|
#440 (permalink) | |
|
Moderator*
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 21,115
|
It will be a cold day in hell (or a Remillard fight) when I travel to another state to take in the Burchfield Follies again.
This made me chuckle from CES' main web page: Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|